期刊文献+

“福利污名”在农村低保中真实存在吗?——兼析农村低保家计调查目标定位方法的变通执行 被引量:2

The Myth of Welfare Stigma in Rural Minimum Living-hood Guarantee Scheme——Discussion on the Misimplementation of Means Test as Targeting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国外学术界对家计调查型社会救助是否会致使申请者、受助者及其家庭成员蒙受福利污名莫衷一是,国内学术界对福利污名在以家计调查作为目标定位方法的低保中是否真实存在也存有分歧。在对中部地区某县调查的基础上发现多种目标定位并行、“不要白不要”的低保文化蔓延以及变通执行张榜公示致使福利污名在农村低保中不存在。家计调查在农村地区不具备实施的必要条件和手段是农村低保的目标定位方法需要改革的深层次原因。 Scholars,at home and abroad,have controversy on whether welfare stigma is actually existed either on social assistant or Rural Minimum Living-hood Guarantee Scheme,since both of them apply means test to targeting.Based on the field investigation at a central Chinese county,it has been found that there is a myth of welfare stigma in Rural Minimum Living-hood Guarantee Scheme.From the research,three reasons leading to the above results:multi-methods of targeting;the custom of keen on allowance as a free lunch;irregular proclamation.In a word,It is the high time that targeting should be reformed as the lack of necessary condition and methods to implement means test in rural areas.
作者 赖志杰 Lai Zhijie
出处 《河南社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第11期100-105,共6页 Henan Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目“东中西部农村最低生活保障政策执行偏差及治理比较研究”(16CSH031)
关键词 福利污名 农村最低生活保障 目标定位 家计调查 变通执行 Welfare Stigma Rural Minimum Living-hood Guarantee Scheme Targeting Means Test Misimplementation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献87

  • 1邓大松,吴小武.完善农村居民最低生活保障制度的若干思考[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,59(5):644-648. 被引量:34
  • 2张时飞,唐钧.辽宁、河北两省农村低保制度研究报告[J].东岳论丛,2007,28(1):67-79. 被引量:42
  • 3民政部.《2007年民政事业发展统计报告》,见中华人民共和国民政部网站.
  • 4民政部社会救助司.“中国农村社会救助国际研讨会”.2008.8.12-19,山东,德州.
  • 5Gilbert. N. & Terrel. P. (2002) Dimensions of Social Welfare Policy (5th edition), Allen & Bacon.
  • 6Saunders, P. (1994), Welfare and Inequality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • 7Moffitt, Robert A. (ed.) Means - Tested Transfer Programs in the United States. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 2003. p 141.
  • 8民政部社会救助司网站http://dbs.mca.gov.cn/article/csdb/tjsj/200804/20080400013464.shtml.
  • 9民政部.《2007年民政事业发展统计报告》.
  • 10Shaw, Greg M (2007) The Welfare Debate, Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press; Faherty, Sara (2005) Point -Counter point: Welfare Reform, Chelsea House Publishers.

共引文献251

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部