论醉酒型危险驾驶罪排除但书出罪

On the Crime of Drunken Dangerous Driving Not Applicable to Provisio Exonerstion

危险驾驶罪入刑以来,理论界及实务界关于能否援引《刑法》总则但书的规定予以出罪一直争论不止。事实上,但书出罪的功能仅是提示性的,提示立法者及有解释权的司法机关,在设置或者解释构成要件时将犯罪情节轻微,危害不大的行为予以出罪化。司法实践中绝不能直接援引但书将危险驾驶罪出罪。

Since the crime of dangerous driving was sentenced,there has been a lot of controversy in theory and practice about whether to invoke the provisio of the General Principles of Criminal Law to convict it.In fact,the function of the proviso is only suggestive,suggesting that legislators and judicial organs with the power of interpretation should criminalize acts with minor and less harmful circumstances when setting or interpreting the constitutive elements.In judicial practice,the proviso must not be directly invoked to convict dangerous driving.