期刊文献+

Wiltse肌间隙入路在伤椎置钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折术中的应用 被引量:17

Application of internal fixation with screws for thoracolumbar fractures through the muscular space approach of Wiltse
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Wiltse肌间隙入路伤椎置钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年4月—2017年1月中国人民解放军第九八医院全军创伤骨科修复重建中心收治的98例胸腰椎骨折合并脊髓损伤单节段胸腰椎骨折患者临床资料,男性57例,女性41例;年龄21~70岁,平均43.6岁。患者均接受后路椎弓根螺钉内固定手术,依据手术入路不同分为Wiltse肌间隙入路(Wiltse组)和传统手术入路(传统组),各49例。记录两组患者术中出血量和时间、术后引流量,术前1d、术后1、12个月、末次随访时分别记录患者VAS评分、ODI指数、后凸Cobb角等指标和并发症情况。结果患者均成功完成手术,随访13~35个月,平均23.1个月;Wiltse组术中出血量(115.61±12.09)mL、术后引流量(68.22±11.03)mL少于传统组(179.09±13.81)mL、(123.94±14.15)mL,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Wiltse组手术时间(78.82±7.01)min长于传统组(77.72±7.51)min,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);末次随访时,Wiltse组患者VAS评分(3.10±1.65)分低于传统组(4.91±1.58)分,Wiltse组患者ODI指数(8.19±2.09)分低于传统组(11.92±2.93)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Wiltse组患者后凸Cobb角显著小于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者手术均未发生严重并发症。结论Wiltse肌间隙入路伤椎置钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折可有效降低手术创伤、改善生活质量,建议行临床推广。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture by internal fixation with screws in the injured vertebrae through the muscular space approach of Wiltse.Methods From Apr.2015 to Jan.2017,the clinical data of 98 patients with thoracolumbar fracture and single segment thoracolumbar fracture with spinal cord injury were analyzed retrospectively,including 57 males and 41 females,aged 21-70 years with an average of 43.6 years.All patients were treated with posterior pedicle screw internal fixation.According to the different operation approach,they were divided into two groups:Wiltse muscular space approach(Wiltse group)and traditional operation approach(traditional group).The bleeding volume and time,postoperative drainage volume,VAS score,ODI score,kyphotic Cobb angle and other indexes and complications were recorded in the two groups before operation,1 day after operation,1 and 12 months after operation and at the last follow-up.Results All the patients successfully completed the operation and were followed up for 13-35 months,with an average of 23.12 months.The bleeding volume and postoperative drainage volume in the Wiltse group were(115.61±12.09)mL and(68.22±11.03)mL,respectively,which were lower than those in the traditional group(179.09±13.81)mL and(123.94±14.15)mL,with statistical significance(P<0.05).The operation time in the Wiltse group was(78.82±7.01)min,longer than that in the traditional group of(77.72±751)min,but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05);at the last follow-up,the VAS score(3.10±1.65)and ODI index(8.19±2.09)of patients in the Wiltse group were lower than those in the traditional group of(4.91±1.58)and(11.92±2.93),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the Cobb angle of patients in the Wiltse group was significantly lower than that in the traditional group(P<0.05).No serious complication occurred in either group.Conclusion The treatment of thoracolumbar fracture by internal fixation with screws in the injured vertebrae through Wiltse muscular space approach can effectively reduce the surgical trauma and improve the quality of life,and it is recommended to be popularized clinically.
作者 徐寅强 邢顺民 方良勤 谭俊铭 XU Yin-qiang;XING Shun-min;FANG Liang-qin;TAN Jun-ming(The Center of Trauma Repair and Reconstruction of the 98th Hospital of PLA,Huzhou,Zhejiang 313000,China)
出处 《创伤外科杂志》 2019年第12期893-896,共4页 Journal of Traumatic Surgery
关键词 胸腰椎骨折 入路 置钉 内固定 thoracolumbar fracture approach screw internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献52

  • 1胡家美,徐新华,乐敏莉.内固定联合椎体成形术对脊柱骨折患者Frankel分级、Cobb角及椎管侵占情况的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(8):2148-2150. 被引量:22
  • 2李淳德.脊柱内固定融合术在腰椎退变性疾病治疗中的作用[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(25):1734-1736. 被引量:19
  • 3毛路,沈忆新,王磊.椎间盘源性下腰痛临床治疗研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(1):39-41. 被引量:21
  • 4Rohlmann A,Nabil BH,Bergmann G,et al.Effect of a pedicle screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics:a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis[J].J Biomech,2010,15:2963-2969.
  • 5Tuttle J,Shakir A,Choudhri HF.Paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation.Technical note and preliminary report on 47 cases[J].Neurosurg Focus,2006,3:5.
  • 6Goel VK,Lim TH,Gwon J,et al.Effects of an internal fixation device:a comprehensive biomechanical investigation[J].Spine,1991,16:S155-161.
  • 7Kabins MB,Weinstein JN,Spratt KF,et al.Isolated L4-L5 fusions u-sing the variable screw placement system:unilateral versus bilateral[J].Spinal Disord,1992,5:39-49.
  • 8Suk KS,Lee HM,Kim NH,et al.Unilateral versus bilateral pediclescrew fixation in lumbar spinal fusion[J].Spine,2000,25:1843-1847.
  • 9Schleicher P,Beth P,Ottenbacher A,et al.Biomechanical evaluation of different asymmetrical posterior stabilization methods for minimally i n v a s i v e t r a n s f o r a m i n a l l u m b a r i n t e r b o d y f u s i o n[J].N e u r o s u rg Spine,2008,9:363-371.
  • 10Zhao J,Zhang F,Chen X,et al.Posterior interbody fusion using a diagonal cage with unilateral transpedicular screw fixation for lumbar stenosis[J].Clin Neurosci,2011,18:324-328.

共引文献78

同被引文献135

引证文献17

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部