期刊文献+

论罗尔斯知识能力上的稳定正义共识——西方的正义危机之消除

On Rawls’ Stable Justice Consensus Based on Knowledge Capacity——Resolving the Western Justice Crisis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 道德的都是历史的,西方的正义理论是一种需要不断反思的历史性理论。当代价值与学说的多元论冲击了西方社会正义的现实性和当代形式,西方自由多元社会因为缺乏正义而陷入一种正义危机。为回应时代命题,罗尔斯谨慎抛出了在公民共享的公共理性之上证明的一种有限的政治正义共识。这一知识能力之上的正义共识在哲学与政治、真理与理性之间建立了友谊。公共理性具有一种逻辑力量,能提供一种共识形式的社会正义,支持公平社会的安宁稳定。同时,公民的道德能力和社会情感也可以支持正义共识。共识形式的社会正义还需要在稳定性上保留对未来的开放性。 All moral is historical,and the western theory of justice is a historical theory that needs constant reflection.The pluralism of contemporary values and theories has impacted the reality and contemporary form of the western social justice.In response to the proposition of the times,Rawls carefully put forward a limited political justice consensus,which was proved on the basis of public reason,shared by citizens.The justice consensus over the knowledge capacity establishes the friendship between philosophy and politics as well as truth and reason.Public reason has a logical power to provide a consensus form of social justice to support the peace and stability of a just society.At the same time,citizens'moral capacity and social emotion can also support justice consensus.The social justice in a consensual form also requires to maintain openness to the future in terms of stability.
作者 曹乙龙 CAO Yi-long(School of Philosophy and Public Administration,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110036,China)
出处 《唐都学刊》 2019年第6期45-49,共5页 Tangdu Journal
基金 国家社科基金项目:“社会主义核心价值观日常生活化的理论与实践问题研究”(16BKS121)成果
关键词 罗尔斯 知识能力 正义共识 公共理性 正义危机 Rawls knowledge capability justice consensus public reason justice crisis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1Baker, C. E., Media, Markets, and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002.
  • 2Barry, B. , "John Rawls and the Search for Stability", Ethics, Vol. 105, No. 4, July 1995.
  • 3Benhabib, S. , Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy, in S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democra- cy and Difference, Comesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
  • 4Benhabib, S. , The Claims of Culture : Equality and Diversity in the Global Era, Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2002.
  • 5Cohen, J. , For a Democratic Society, in S. Freeman (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • 6Dean, J. , "Cybersalons and Civil Society : Rethinking the Public Sphere in Transnational Technocuhure", Public Culture, Vol. 13, No. 2, 243-265, Spring 2001.
  • 7Fraser, N. , Rethinking the Public Sphere ,A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy, in N. Fraser, Justice Interruptus , Critical Reflections on the "Postsocialist" Condition, London : Routledge, 1997.
  • 8Fraser, N., Honneth, A. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, London: New York, 2003.
  • 9Garnham, N. , The Media and the Public Sphere, in C. Calhoun, ( Ed. ), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge, Mass : MIT Press 1999 ( sixth edition).
  • 10Gutmann, A. , Rawls on the Relationship between Liberalism and Democracy, in S. Freeman (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部