期刊文献+

上海市初中化学学业评价试题与课程标准一致性分析——以2004-2017年试题为例 被引量:3

Consistency Analysis of Shanghai Junior High School Chemistry Academic Evaluation Test Questions and Curriculum Standards:Taking 2004-2017 Examination Questions as an Example
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用SEC一致性研究模式,从内容主题和认知水平2个维度来分析2004年至2017年上海市初中化学学业评价试题与课程标准之间的一致性。结果表明,学业评价试题与课程标准一致性总体水平一般;在内容主题和认知水平维度上的一致性水平有一定差异。 The Chemistry Assessment Tests of Junior Middle School Students in Shanghai from 2004 to 2017 are used as the research object. The alignment between assessments and curriculum standards is analyzed from the two dimensions which concluded the topic and cognitive demand by using the SEC alignment analysis model. The factors on alignment are briefly explained. The conclusions are drawn: the alignment between assessments and curriculum standards of the junior high school in Shanghai is not bad and there are some differences.
作者 朱婧安 沈甸 ZHU Jing-An;SHEN Dian(East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China;Shanghai Qingpu Dongfang Middle School,Shanghai 201700,China)
出处 《化学教育(中英文)》 CAS 北大核心 2019年第23期11-17,共7页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
关键词 初中化学 学业评价试题 课程标准 一致性 junior high school chemistry assessment curriculum standards alignment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1Porter A C. Measuring the Content of Instruction: Uses in Research and Practice [M]. Educational Researcher, 2002, 31 (7): 3-14.
  • 2X F Liu, B H Zhang, L L Ling, Gavin Fulmer, Beaumie Kim, H Q Yuan. Alignment between the Physics Content Standard and the Standardized Test: A Comparison Among the United States-New York State, Singapore, and China-Jiangsu [J]. Science Education, 2008, 93 (5): 777-797.
  • 3Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). Coding Procedures for Curriculum Content Analyses [M]. Washington, DC: CCSSO, 2004.
  • 4Anderson L W, Krathwohl, D R. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing -A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives [M]. New York: Longman, 2001.
  • 5中华人民共和国教育部制定.基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)(2001)[N].中国教育报,2001-7-21.
  • 6Jennings J.F. Why National Standards and Tests .9 Politics and Quest for Better Schools. SAGE Publication, 1998:66-72.
  • 7Porter A.C. Measuring the content of instruction : Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher,2002, (7) :2-16.
  • 8教育部考试中心.2012年普通高等学校招生全国统一考试说明(化学)[M].北京:高等教育出版社.2012:121-131.
  • 9Anderson, L. W., & Krethwohl, D.R. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom/S taxonomy of educa- tional objectives. New York : Longman 2001 : 6-28.
  • 10中华人民共和国教育部.基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)(2001)[N].中国教育报,2001-7-21.

共引文献38

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部