期刊文献+

管理科学部2017~2018年度科学基金项目绩效评估结果分析 被引量:4

Analysis of Post-Review of the Results of Projects Funded by Department of Management Sciences of NSFC in 2017~2018
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国家自然科学基金委员会管理科学部在2017~2018年度,对2011年立项资助的面上项目和地区科学基金项目、2012年立项资助的面上项目、青年科学基金项目和地区科学基金项目,以及2013年立项资助的青年项目,共计2 907项进行了绩效评估。通过对不同项目类型、不同学科以及不同项目主持人的评估结果分析发现,与1992~2010年度资助的项目相比,2017~2018年度评估的项目呈现出一些新的特点。具体表现为:近两年项目绩效评估的优良率总体有所提高,各学科绩效评估的结果与学科发展态势具有一致性,项目主持人呈现年轻化趋势等。故需要结合新时代科学基金资助导向,建立与4类科学问题属性相匹配的绩效评估指标体系。 In 2017~2018, the Management Science Department of National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC) has conducted a performance evaluation of 2 907 projects funded in 2011 and 2013. Those projects include the General Projects and the Regional Science Fund Projects which have been approved and sponsored in 2011, the General Projects, the Youth Science Fund Projects and the Regional Science Fund Projects which have been approved and sponsored in 2012, as well as the Youth Science Fund Projects which have been approved and sponsored in 2013. Based on analysis of the evaluation results on different project types, different disciplines and different project investigators, we find that compared with the management science projects funded by NSFC between 1992~2010, those projects assessed in 2017~2018 show some new characteristics. Specifically, the results show that the overall excellence rate of project performance evaluation has been improved in the past two years, that the results of performance evaluation in each discipline are consistent with the development trend of the discipline, and that the project hosts present a younger trend, etc. Therefore, a performance evaluation index system matching the attributes of four types of scientific questions should be established based on the orientation of science fund funding in the new era.
作者 杨佳琪 李若筠 李江涛 YANG Jiaqi;LI Ruoyun;LI Jiangtao(National Natural Science Foundation of China,Beijing,China)
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第11期1607-1611,1660,共6页 Chinese Journal of Management
关键词 管理科学 资助项目 绩效评估 management science funding project performance evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献6

共引文献6

同被引文献21

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部