期刊文献+

“拔尖计划”学生拔尖在何处 被引量:6

What is the Nature of Students in Program for Cultivating Top-notch Talents
原文传递
导出
摘要 对"拔尖计划"学生的访谈分析发现,他们对自身拔尖性的认知可分别归为学业成绩优秀、学科兴趣、学术理想三类。在学院制和实体化班级培养模式下,"拔尖计划"学生易将拔尖性简单指向学业成绩优秀,在虚拟班级培养模式下,学生多将拔尖性归结为浓厚的学科兴趣,同时也有少数学生经由探究性学习而深刻感知到学科及学术价值,从而能超越培养环境约束建构起学术理想,这也是多数学生认可的拔尖性的本质。为更好地培养拔尖创新人才,实施"拔尖计划"应进一步深入推进探究性教学模式,帮助学生建构学术理想。 Interviewing the students from the program for cultivating top-notch talents, their cognitions on the program could be divided into such three categories as excellent academic performance, subject interest and academic ideal. Under the cultivation mode of college system and substantialized class, students tended to regard it as excellent academic performance;under the cultivation mode of virtualized class, students mostly defined it as strong subject interest. Meanwhile, a few deeply perceived the subject and academic value through inquiry-based learning, transcended the constraints of institutional environment and constructed academic ideals, which was also recognized by most of them. In order to improve the program, the inquiry-based teaching mode should be implemented to help them construct their academic ideals.
作者 路丽娜 刘隽颖 LU Li-na;LIU Jun-ying(School of Education,Shaanxi University of Science&Technology,Xi’an 710021,China;Institute of Higher Education,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan 430074,China)
出处 《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第11期79-85,共7页 Journal of Higher Education
基金 全国教育科学规划教育部青年课题(EIA180495)
关键词 拔尖计划 培养模式 学术理想 program for cultivating top-notch talents cultivation mode academic ideal
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献116

  • 1潘云鹤,路甬祥,韩祯祥,吕维雪,吴健.拔尖创新人才培养二十年的探索与实践[J].中国大学教学,2005(11):21-23. 被引量:61
  • 2杨德广.培养拔尖创新人才应克服体制性和制度性障碍[J].中国高教研究,2006(12):12-14. 被引量:27
  • 3江泽民.全面建设小康社会,开创中国特色社会主义事业新局面-在中国共产党第十六次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL].新华网,2002-11-17.http://news.xinhuanet.com/ziliao/2002-11/17/content.693542.htm.
  • 4国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年)[EB/OL].http://www.edu.cn/html/e/jiaoyuguihuagangyao.htm,2010-01-18.
  • 5陆根书,程光旭,杨兆芳.大学课堂学习环境论[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2010.
  • 6Diseth, A. Students' evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Researeh, 2007, (2).
  • 7Cano F. Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, (2).
  • 8Prosser, M., & Trigweil, K. Perceptions of the teaching environment and its relationship to approaches to teaching [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1997, ( 1 ).
  • 9Hu, L., & Bender, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternations [J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, (6).
  • 10Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leu.ng, D. The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, (1).

共引文献484

同被引文献65

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部