期刊文献+

大学生人格特质与性别因素和风险决策行为的关系 被引量:7

Relation of personality trait and gender factor to risk decision-making behavior in college students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨大五人格特质及性别变量与大学生风险决策行为的关系。方法:招募在校大学生110名,采用大五人格简氏量表(NE0-FFI)与气球模拟风险决策任务(BART)分别测量被试的外倾性、责任性、宜人性、神经质、开放性及风险决策行为水平。结果:女生神经质与外向性特质得分高于男生,责任性与风险决策的得分低于男生(均P<0.05)。神经质负向预测风险决策(β=-0.24),宜人性与性别的交互项负向预测风险决策行为(β=-0.34)。方差分析结果显示,性别主效应、宜人性与性别的交互作用均有统计学意义(P<0.001或P<0.05)。结论:大学生大五人格特质中神经质与风险决策行为密切相关,而宜人性与风险决策的关系受到性别因素的制约。 Objective:To explore the relation of Big five personality and gender to the risk decision-making behavior in college students.Methods:Totally 110 college students were assessed with the NEO-Five-Factor Inventory(NE0-FFI) and Balloon Analogue Risk Task(BART).NE0-FFI and BART were used to measure the level of extroversion,responsibility,agreeableness,neuroticism,openness and risk decision-making behavior respectively.Results:The scores of neuroticism and extroversion traits were higher in females than in males(Ps<0.05),and the scores of responsibility and risk decision-making were lower in females than in males(Ps<0.05).Neuroticism predicted risk decision-making directly and negatively(β=-0.24)and agreeableness and gender could affect risk decision-making jointly(β=-0.34).The results of ANOVE showed that the main effect of gender and the interaction between agreeableness and gender were significant(P<0.001 or P<0.05).Conclusion:It suggests that neuroticism of Big five personality traits is closely related to risk decision-making behavior in college students,while the relationship between agreeableness and risk decision-making is restricted by gender factors.
作者 张冉冉 黄列玉 陈永 张宛筑 ZHANG Ranran;HUANG Lieyu;CHEN Yong;ZHANG Wanzhu(College of Medical humanities,Guizhou Medical University,Guiyang 550004,China)
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期56-60,共5页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词 风险决策 大五人格 气球模拟风险决策任务 主效应 交互作用 risk decision-making Big five personality Balloon Analogue Risk Task main effect interactive effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献112

  • 1方晓义.青少年关于抽烟、饮酒的危害认识及其对青少年抽烟、饮酒行为的影响[J].心理发展与教育,1993,9(2):25-31. 被引量:7
  • 2关于青春期教育若干理论问题的探讨[J].教育研究,1996,17(5):72-75. 被引量:13
  • 3林丹华,方晓义.同伴、父母对青少年吸烟认识、吸烟行为的相对影响力[J].心理发展与教育,2001,17(4):28-34. 被引量:38
  • 4Acheson, A., Richards, J. B., & de Wit, H. (2007). Effects of sleep deprivation on impulsive behaviors in men and women. Physiology and Behavior, 91,579-587.
  • 5Ackert, L. F., Charupat, N., Church, B. K., & Deaves, R. (2006). An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting. Experimental Economics, 9, 5-16.
  • 6Aklin, W. M., Lejuez, C. W., Zvolensky, M. J., Kahler, C. W., & Gwadz, M. (2005). Evaluation of behavioral measures of risk taking propensity with inner city adolescents. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 215-228.
  • 7Arnett, J. J. (1996). Sensation seeking, aggressiveness, and adolescent reckless behavior. Personality and Individual Difference, 20, 693-702.
  • 8Baker, M. D., Jr., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Male risk-taking as a context-sensitive signaling device. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1136-1139.
  • 9Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15.
  • 10Bell, D- E. (1982i. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961-981.

共引文献49

同被引文献95

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部