期刊文献+

基于扎根理论的外科医师技术岗位等级分级制度优化概念框架构建 被引量:4

Construction of the Conceptual Framework for the Grade Classification Optimization of Surgeons’ Technical Post Based on Grounded Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的构建外科医师技术岗位等级分级制度优化概念框架。方法于2017年7-12月按照目的抽样方法选取25名医院外科部门管理者和研究者进行半结构化访谈,采用扎根理论三级编码进行归纳分析。结果经过三级编码,梳理出574条原始概念、78条概念、22个范畴、5个主范畴,形成包含4个核心支架--政策目标、分级制度、优化维度和优化策略的外科医师技术岗位等级分级制度优化概念框架,同时包含5条理论假设。结论外科医师技术岗位等级分级制度优化不仅要坚持医师技术服务价值的目标导向,设置能够体现政策目标以及可操作和可量化的分级指标,还应该适应外科岗位内外部环境变化,不断改革创新。 Objective To construct a conceptual framework for the grade classification optimization of surgeons’ technical post. Methods 25 hospital managers and researchers were selected for semi-structured interviews with purpose sampling methods from July to December, 2017, and the grounded theory’s three-level coding was used for inductive analysis. Results After three-level coding,a conceptual framework for the grade classification system optimization of surgeons’ technical post consists of 574 originalconcepts,78 concepts,22 generics and 5 main concepts. 4 core categories-policy objectives,grade classification system,optimization dimension and optimization strategies was built,including 5 theoretical assumptions. Conclusion The grade classification system optimization of the surgeon’s technical post not only insists on the goal orientation of physician’s technical service value,but also sets the grading indicators that can reflect the policy objectives and can be operated and quantified. It should also adapt to the internal and external environmental changes of surgeons’ post and continuously reform and innovate.
作者 王曼丽 周朝华 方海清 高兴民 陶红兵 WANG Man-li;ZHOU Chao-hua;FANG Hai-qing(China Center for Special Economic Zone Research,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen,Guangdong,518060,China)
出处 《中国医院管理》 北大核心 2019年第12期48-51,共4页 Chinese Hospital Management
基金 国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(71774061) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJC630095) 中国博士后科学基金项目(2019M653051)
关键词 外科医师 技术岗位 等级分级优化 概念框架 扎根理论 surgeons technical post grade classification optimization conceptual framework Grounded Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献77

  • 1王颖,罗力,谢洪彬,王环增,张闽元,宋峻,段勇,张爱莉,高解春,常军,张为佳,陈海娟,姚震涛,毛庭龙,马红兵,孙明,周锦颢,杨保利,花庆华,刘昕,马安宁,张晓乙,陈政,李路勇,郭杏雅,黄慧玲,杨小川,王卫华,郝模.构建知识导向型的公立医疗机构职工收入分配制度[J].中国医院管理,2006,26(1):23-25. 被引量:6
  • 2王文杰,张云鹏.矿山安全管理的模糊综合评价[J].河北理工学院学报,2006,28(4):1-4. 被引量:9
  • 3陈凯,张晶.医院岗位评价方法初探[J].卫生经济研究,2007,24(12):30-31. 被引量:5
  • 4Good medical practice for physicians--Prepared by the Fed- eration of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the UK [S]. 2004.
  • 5Kavic M S. Competency and the Six Core Competencies[ J]. JSLS, 2002 (6) : 95-97.
  • 6Hsiao W C, Braun P, Yntema D, et al. Estimating physicians' work for a resource-based relative-value scale [J]. NEJM, 1988, 319 (13): 835-841.
  • 7Gorrindo T, Goldfarb E, Birnbanm R J, et al. Simulation- based ongoing professional practice evaluation in psychiatry: a novel tool for performance assessment[ J]. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2013, 39(7) : 319-323.
  • 8Makary M A, Wick E and Freischlag JA. PPE, OPPE, and FPPE: complying with the new alphabet soup of credentia- ling[J]. Arch Surg, 2011, 146(6) : 642-644.
  • 9Wiersema M J, Mergener K. Current procedural terminolo- gy, Resource-based Relative Value Scale, and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services : overview [ J ]. Gas- trointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2006, 16(4) : 775-787.
  • 10Smith L S, Clark S, Hochstetler Z, et al. Medicare RBRVS 2013 The Physicians's Guide[ S]. American Medical Asso- ciation, 2013.

共引文献122

同被引文献51

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部