期刊文献+

库恩论“不可通约性”及其对文化互鉴的意义 被引量:3

Kuhn’s Theory of “Incommensurability” and Its Significance to Cultural Mutual Appreciation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学界经常将"不可通约性"解读为两种范式之间无法互译,持不同范式的成员在概念、行动、标准选择等方面无法相互理解,由此简单地认为不同文化之间无法互通。为消除以上误解,通过对库恩科学哲学思想的历时性和共时性重读,不仅还原了库恩"不可通约性"思想的完整内涵,还充分揭示了其对文化互鉴的积极意义。 In academic circles,"incommensurability"is often interpreted as the non-translatability between the two different paradigms which cannot understand each other in terms of concept,action,selection criteria,etc.Thus,they simply believe it is very difficult to interflow between the cultures.In order to eliminate the above misunderstandings,the diachronic and synchronic re-reading of Kuhn’s thought on philosophy of science not only reconstructs the complete connotation of Kuhn’s thought on"incommensurability",but also fully reveals its positive significance to mutual appreciation of culture.
作者 邱德胜 彭家锋 QIU De-sheng;PENG Jia-feng(School of Politics and Public Management,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China)
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第6期78-83,共6页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社科基金西部项目(17XZX008) 教育部人文社科基金青年项目(15YJC720020) 西南大学中央高校基本科研重大项目(SWU1709217)
关键词 库恩 不可通约性 文化互鉴 Kuhn incommensurability cultural mutual appreciation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1王祖陶.中国近代的化学教育[J].中国科技史杂志,1984,19(2):93-94. 被引量:2
  • 2Kuhn T S. The road since structure[M],Chicago : University of Chicago Press ,2000.
  • 3“relativism,,词条:http://plato.Stanford, edu/entries/relativism/#Rel(2015 -09 -11)[2015 - 9 -20].
  • 4Kuhn T S. The structureof scientific revolutions[M]. 3rd ed. Chicago:Universityof Chicago Press, 1996 : 148~ 150.
  • 5DavidA. Wells, Well?s Principles and Appli-cations of Chemistry? Ivison, Blakemen,Talor Press,1858.
  • 6Sankey Howard. Epistemic relativism and the problemof the criterion[J]. Studies in History and Philosophyof Science?2011(42) : 562 - 570.
  • 7Kuhn T S. The road since structure[M]. Chicago:Uni-versity of Chicago Press,2000.
  • 8Kuhn T S. Reflections on my critics[A]//Criticism andthe Growth of Knowledge (vol. 4) [M]. Imre Lakatos,Alan E Musgrave,Eds. Cambridge : Cambridge Univer-sity Press, 1970:231 - 278.
  • 9Kuhn T S. The structure of scientific revolutions[M].3rd ed. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1996.
  • 10ZHONG Long一xi. The complexity of difference: indi-vidual, cultural, and cross - cutural[j], Interdivscipli-nary Science Reviews?2010(35) :341 - 352.

共引文献7

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部