合谷刺肾关穴治疗肩关节周围炎临床研究

Clinical Study of Join Valley Needling Shenguan Point in Treating Periarthritis of Shoulder Joint

目的:对比观察合谷刺肾关穴和普通针刺法治疗肩关节周围炎的临床疗效。方法:将确诊的68例肩关节周围炎患者随机分为观察组和对照组。观察组使用合谷刺肾关穴治疗,对照组使用普通针刺法治疗。治疗后进行McGill疼痛评分、Constant-Murley(CMS)评分比较。结果:两组治疗后的McGill疼痛评分、CMS评分与治疗前分别进行组内比较,差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01)。对于McGill疼痛评分差值、Constant-Murley(CMS)评分差值及总有效率,观察组和对照组进行组间比较,均有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:两种治疗方法均能有效治疗肩关节周围炎,但合谷刺肾关穴治疗肩关节周围炎疗效高于普通针刺法,且用针极少,可缩短病程,疗效更显著。

Objective:To explore the curative effect of join valley needling Shenguan point and common needling in the treatment of periarthritis of shoulder.Methods:68 patients with periarthritis of shoulder were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group.The observation group was treated with join valley needling Shenguan point;whereas the control group was treated with common needling.The scores of McGill pain scale and Constant-Murley Scale(CMS)were compared between the two groups after the treatment.Results:There were statistical differences in the scores of McGill pain scale and the scores of CMS between before the treatment and after the treatment in the same group(P<0.01).The difference value in McGill pain scores and CMS scores,as well as the total effective rate were significant between the two groups(P<0.01).Conclusion:Both therapies can effectively treat periarthritis of shoulder joint,but the therapy of join valley needling Shenguan point is more efficient.This therapy can shorten the treatment course with few needles applied.