民法的独立性与跨学科研究的失败

The Autonomy or the Failed Interdisciplinarity of Civil Law

有关法律-经济的跨学科研究在许多国家都展开了热烈的学术讨论。法学作为人文学传统中的解释科学与作为社会科学的、经验性的、现实分析的经济学从根本上是不相容的。在过去的二十年里,学术界讨论的焦点集中在法学与新制度经济学的协同合作上。新制度经济学只是在少数几个子领域对法律科学的利益诉求做出了间接的贡献。今天,我们基本上只能做到法学和经济学的和平共存,这只是部分地实现一种相互富有成效且丰富彼此的学科合作关系,而且在任何情况下都不可能扩展为一个综合性的跨学科研究领域。由于规范主义和现实主义的二元方法论,法律理性和经济理性之间真正的整体协调似乎仍然无法实现。法学作为一门独立的和自足的学科是毋庸置疑的。当然,它确实需要向诸如经济学那样的辅助学科学习。

A lively scholarly discussion took place in many countries on the topic of the legal-economic interdisciplinarity.Law as an interpretation science in the tradition of humanities is fundamentally incompatible with empirical,real-analytic economics as social science.During the last twenty years the scholarly discourse has been focused upon the synergetic cooperation of law and New Institutional Economics.Only in a few sub-areas does New Institutional Economics indirectly contribute to the pursuit of legal scientific interests.Today we are basically reduced to a peaceful coexistence of law and economics,which only partially achieves a mutually fruitful and enriching co-disciplinary relationship,and which in any case cannot extend to a synthesised interdisciplinarity.A true integral congruence of legal and economic rationalities still seems unattainable due to the method dualism of Normativism and Realism.Jurisprudence is unchallenged as an autonomous and self-sufficient scientific discipline.Of course,it is called upon to learn from auxiliary sciences such as economics.