期刊文献+

MRI征象评分对胎盘种植异常的诊断价值 被引量:12

The value of score scale of MRI signs in diagnosis of placental implantation abnormalities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨MRI征象评分对胎盘种植异常的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2017年6月-2019年3月在我院收治的疑似为胎盘种植异常的189例孕妇的临床和MRI资料,根据手术病理结果,将患者分为对照组及胎盘种植异常组,后者又分为粘连型和植入/穿透型两组,比较3组间MRI征象的差异,将组间差异有统计学意义的征象纳入评分表,建立改良MRI征象评分表,计算基于该评分表的诊断符合率,并绘制ROC曲线,确定基于改良MRI征象评分表诊断各型胎盘种植异常的截断值。结果:采用改良MRI征象评分表对胎盘种植异常的总体诊断符合率为89.9%、敏感度93.5%、特异度87.5%,阳性预测值为83.7%,阴性预测值为95.1%。根据ROC曲线,鉴别对照组及粘连型胎盘种植异常组的截断值为4分,而鉴别粘连型与植入/穿透型的截断值为8分。结论:改良MRI征象评分表对胎盘种植异常具有较高的诊断效能。 Objective:To explore the value of score scale of MRI signs in diagnosis of placental implantation.Methods:Clinical and MRI data of 189 pregnant women suspected of placental implantation abnormalities was retrospectively analyzed in our hospital from June 2017 to March 2019.Accor-ding to their clinical data,the patients were divided into control group and placental implantation group(including accreta and increta/percreta subgroup).The MRI signs with statistical significance were included and the improved MRI signs scoring scale was established,and its diagnostic accuracy for placental implantation was evaluated.Based on the ROC curve,the cut-off value for the differentiation of various types of placental implantation was determined.Results:Based on the score scale,the diagnostic accuracy,sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value for placental implantation were 89.9%,93.5%,87.5%,83.7%and 95.1%,respectively.ROC curve analysis showed that the cut-off value for differentiation of control group and accreta group was 4 scores,and for accreta group and increta/percreta group it was 8 scores.Conclusion:The score scale of MRI signs for placenta implantation abnormality is of high diagnostic efficacy.
作者 李晓凡 余红军 LI Xiao-fan;YU Hong-jun(Department of Radiology,Kunming First People's Hospital,Kunming 650011,China)
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2019年第12期1358-1363,共6页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 磁共振成像 胎盘种植异常 胎盘粘连 胎盘植入 胎盘穿透 评分系统 Placental implantation abnormality Placenta accreta Placenta increta Placenta percreta Magnetic resonance imaging Scoring system
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献52

  • 1Gurol-Urganci I,Cromwell DA,Edozien LC,et al.Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section:a popula-tion-based study and meta-analysis [J].BMC Pregnancy Child-birth,2011,11(1):95.
  • 2Bahar A,Abusham A,Eskandar M,et al.Risk factors and preg nancy outcome in different types of placenta previa[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2009,31(2):126-131.
  • 3Oyelese Y,Smulian JC.Placenta previa,placenta accreta,and vasa previa[J].Obstet Gynecol,2006,107(4):927-941.
  • 4Taipale P,Orden MR,Berg M,et al.Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta and percreta with ultrasonography,color Doppler,and magnetic resonance imaging [J].Obstet Gynecol,2004,104(3):537-540.
  • 5Mansour SM,Elkhyat WM.Placenta previa-accreta:do we need MR imaging[J].Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med,2011,42(3):433-442.
  • 6Dwyer BK,Belogolovkin V,Tran L,et al.Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta.,sonography or magnetic resonance imaging? [J].J Ultrasound Med,2008,27(9):1275-1281.
  • 7Warshak CR,Eskander R,Hull AD,et al.Accuracy of ultrasonog-raphy and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta[J].Obstet Gynecol,2006,108(3):573-581.
  • 8Reddy UM,Filly RA,Copel JA.Prenatal imaging:ultrasonogra-phy and magnetic resonance imaging[J].Obstet Gynecol,2008,112(1):145-157.
  • 9Lim PS,Greenberg M,Edelson MI,et al.Utility of ultrasound and MRI in prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta:a pilot study [J].AJR,2011,197(6):1506-1513.
  • 10MILLER D A, CHOLLET J A, GOODWIN T M. Clinical risk fac- tors for placenta previa -placenta accreta[ J]. Am J Obstet Gyne- col, 1997, 177(1) : 210 -214.

共引文献64

同被引文献97

引证文献12

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部