期刊文献+

3种前路手术方式治疗单节段颈椎间盘突出症近期疗效比较 被引量:5

Comparison of short-term therapeutic effects of three methods of anterior surgery for single segment cervical disc herniation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较经皮前路椎间孔镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术(APECD)、颈椎间盘置换术(CDR)、经颈前路椎间盘切除减压融合术(ACDF)治疗单节段颈椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法将46例单节段颈椎间盘突出症患者按手术方法分为APECD组(23例)、CDR组(10例)和ACDF组(13例)。记录3组手术时间、术中出血量,比较3组术后改善率、术后疼痛VAS评分与JOA评分。结果患者均获得随访,时间15~25(17±3)个月。手术时间:CDR组<ACDF组<APECD组,3组间两两比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术中出血量:CDR组<APECD组<ACDF组,3组间两两比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。末次随访时,3组VAS评分和JOA评分均较术前显著改善(P<0.05),3组间两两比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。APECD组改善率为51.0%,CDR组改善率为43.2%,ACDF组改善率为64.5%,3组间两两比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论3种前路手术方式治疗单节段颈椎间盘突出症均可取得满意的临床疗效,APECD手术创伤小,但术后有复发可能。 Objective To compare therapeutic effects of single segment cervical disc herniation treated with the anterior percutanous endomic cervical dissection(APECD),cervical disc replacement(CDR),anterior cervical disc fusion(ACDF).Methods Forty-six patients with single segment cervical disc herniation were divided into three groups according to the surgical method:APECD group(23 cases),CDR group(10 cases)and ACDF group(13 cases).The operation time,intraoperation bleeding volume,the improvement rate,VAS and JOA scores were recorded and compared.Results All patients were followed up for 15~25(17±3)months.Operation time:CDR group<ACDF group<APECD group,the difference between the two comparisons of the three groups was statistically significant(P<0.05);The intraoperative blood loss:CDR group<APECD group<ACDF group,the difference between the two comparisons of the three groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).At the last follow-up,the pain VAS and JOA score of the three groups were significantly improved compared with those before operation(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference among the three groups(P>0.05).The improvement rate:APECD group was 51.0%,CDR group was 43.2%,ACDF group was 64.5%,there was no significant difference among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusions All three anterior approaches can achieve satisfactory clinical results in the treatment of single segment cervical disc herniation.APECD has less trauma,but it may relapse after operation.
作者 段亮 时亮 刘军 祁洁 弓立群 范亚一 DUAN Liang;SHI Liang;LIU Jun;QI Jie;GONG Li-qun;FAN Ya-yi(Dept of Orthopaedics,Shaanxi Provincial People′s Hospital,Xi′an,Shaanxi 710068,China)
出处 《临床骨科杂志》 2019年第6期641-646,共6页 Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
基金 陕西省自然科学基金(编号:2014JQ4125) 陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目(编号:2015KTCL03-02)
关键词 经皮前路椎间孔镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术 颈椎间盘置换术 经颈前路椎间盘切除减压融合术 单节段颈椎间盘突出症 anterior percutanous endomic cervical dissection cervical disc replacement anterior cervical disc fusion single segment cervical disc herniation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献40

  • 1田伟,刘波,李勤,胡临,李志宇,袁强,孙玉珍.人工颈椎间盘置换手术的临床初步应用体会[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(1):37-40. 被引量:34
  • 2孙宇,潘胜发,张凤山,张立.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎间盘疾患的早期临床观察[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(2):85-89. 被引量:44
  • 3Pospiech J, Stolke D, Wilke HJ, et al. Intradiscal pressure recordings in the cervical spine. Neurosurgery, 1999, 44(2): 384-385.
  • 4Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, et al. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34(2): 101-107.
  • 5Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J, 2009, 9(4): 275-286.
  • 6Traynelis VC. The Prestige cervical disc. Neurosurg Chn N Am, 2005, 16(4): 621-628.
  • 7Wigfield CC, Skrzypiec D, Jackowski A, et al. Internal stress distribution in cervical intervertebral discs: the influence of an artificial cervical joint and simulated anterior interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16(5): 441-449.
  • 8Ozgen S, Naderi S, Ozek MM, et al. A retrospective review of cervical corpectomy: indications, complications and outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2004, 146(10): 1099-1105.
  • 9Geck M J, Eismont FJ. Surgical options for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin North Am, 2002, 33(2): 329-348.
  • 10Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, et al. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 6(3): 198-209.

共引文献59

同被引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部