期刊文献+

多段微创切口在胸腰椎压缩性骨折手术的应用效果

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨多段微创切口椎旁肌间隙入路在胸腰椎段椎体压缩性骨折内固定手术中的应用效果.方法 以随机数字表法,对2017年6月至2019年6月收治的80例胸腰椎段椎体压缩性骨折患者予以分组,对照组40例,采用传统后正中入路行内固定手术治疗,观察组40例,采用多段微创切口椎旁肌间隙入路行内固定手术治疗,对两组患者手术情况、术后疼痛程度、Cobb角和椎体前缘高度丢失情况、血清肌酸激酶(CK)水平予以观察.结果 观察组手术时间、下床活动时间明显较对照组短,出血量明显较对照组少(P<0.05);术前,视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分组间对比,无明显差异(P>0.05),术后12小时、术后24小时,观察组VAS评分均显著较对照组低(P<0.05);术前、术后7天,两组Cobb角及椎体前缘高度丢失率对比,均无显著差异(P>0.05);术前,血清CK组间对比,无明显差异,术后7天,观察组CK明显较对照组低(P<0.05).结论 临床在胸腰椎段椎体压缩性骨折内固定手术中应用多段微创切口椎旁肌间隙入路能够有效缩短手术时间,减少出血量,减轻术后疼痛程度、肌肉损伤程度,提高腰椎结构稳定性改善效果,值得推广.
出处 《浙江创伤外科》 2019年第6期1125-1126,共2页 Zhejiang Journal of Traumatic Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献58

  • 1Ward S R, Kim C W, Eng C M, et al. Architectural analysis and intraoperative measurements demonstrate the unique design of the multifidus muscle for lumbar spine stability[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, 91(1): 176-185.
  • 2Spoor A B, Oner F C. Minimally invasive spine sm~ery in chronic low back pain patients [ J]. J Neurosurg Sci, 2013, 57 (3): 203 -218,.
  • 3Wasehke A, Hartmann C, Walter J, et al. Denervation and atrophy of paraspinal muscles after open lumbar intcrbody fusion is associat- ed with clinical outcome-electromyographic and CT-volumetric in- vestigatlon of 30 patients[ J ]. Acta Neurochir (Wieu), 2014, 152 ( 1 ) : 234 - 244.
  • 4Kim C W. Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery : pre- vention of multifidus muscle injury posterior lumbar surgery [ J ]. Spine, 2010, 35(26):281 -286.
  • 5Buttermann G R, Mullin W J. Two-level circumferential lumbar fu- sion comparing midline and paraspinal posterior approach: 5-year interim outcomes of a randomized, blinded, prospective study [ J ]. J S13inal Disord Tech. 2013, 12(2) : 624 -626.
  • 6Parker JW, Lane JR, Karaikovic EE, et al. Success- ful short-segment instrumentation and [usion for thoracolumbar spine ~'ractures: a consecutive 41/2- year series[J3. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(9): 1157-1170.
  • 7Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, et aL Mini mally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) : technical feasibility and initial results[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005, 18 Suppl: $1-$6.
  • 8Blumenthal S, Mcafee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A pro- spective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I : evaluation of clinical outcomes[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005, 30 (14): 1565-1575, discussion E387-391.
  • 9Kim CW. Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery: prevention of multifidus muscle injury during posterior lumbar surgery[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(26 Suppl) :$281-$286.
  • 10Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle inju- ry after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis[J~. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996, 21(8) :941-944.

共引文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部