期刊文献+

学校评价结果解释的基本问题与前瞻研究 被引量:1

Basic Questions and Prospects of the Interpretation of the Results of School Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学校评价是评估活动结果的体现,而学校评价结果解释是学校评价流程中的重要组成,对评估结论的落实起到决定性作用,应作为一个独立环节加以研究和重视。在实践中,学校评价由于实际效用不高而影响了校长和教师参与的积极性。研究学校评价的结果解释环节,应从学校发展的不同维度确定解释视角,借用新理论和新技术建立解释框架,为学校提供可操作的行动路径和规范技术。研究学校评价结果解释环节,有助于获得对改进学校实践具有启发意义的结论,提高学校评价研究的效度。 Evaluation conclusion is the outcome of evaluation activity,and the interpretation of the school evaluation results is an important part of the school evaluation process,and is an important link between application outcomes and evaluation results,hence,it should be taken as an independent part of the research and attention.In practice,the enthusiasm of the participation of principal and teachers is not high because of the actual effect of school evaluation.The research of the interpretation process of school evaluation,should be determined from the different dimensions of development,use new theory and new technology to establish a framework for interpreting,and provide an operation path of action and technical specification for school.Researching on the interpretation of the school evaluation results is helpful to get the conclusion that can enlighten and improve the validity of school evaluation research in the school practice.
作者 王薇 Wang Wei(Beijing Municipal Educational Supervision and Educational Quality Assessment Research Center,Beijing Academy of Educational Sciences,eijing 100101)
出处 《上海教育评估研究》 2019年第6期7-11,共5页 Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
基金 北京市教育科学“十一五”规划2010年度青年专项课题“学校内部评价结果的解释模型研究”(CHB10202)阶段性成果
关键词 学校评价 结果解释 基本问题 前瞻研究 School evaluation Interpretation of the evaluating results Framework of interpretation Prospective study
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献15

  • 1赵光武.哲学解释学的解释理论与复杂性探索[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,41(4):5-11. 被引量:42
  • 2Lee Teitel,. Assessing the Professional Development Schools[EB/OL]. Practice Series published by AACTE, http: /! ed.gov/PDFS/ED443805.pdf, 2000, p7,p18-21 Impacts of The PDS www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED443805.pdf, 2000, p7,p18-21.
  • 3Sharon Castle, et al.. Student Learning in a Professional Development School and a Control School[J]. The Professional Educator, Spring2008, 32(1): 4, P5-6.
  • 4Kathleen WitseII, et al.. Evolving Through Collaboration and Commitment: The Story of the North Florida Urban Professional Development School Partnership[J]. School-University Partnerships, Fall 2009, 3(2):42-51.
  • 5Douglas Fisher, et al.. Student Teachers Matter: TheImpact of Student Teachers on Elementary-Aged Children in a Professional Development School[J]. Teacher Education Quarterly, Spring 2004, 31(2):48.
  • 6James Cantor & Sue Schaar. A Dynamic Relationship: The Impact of Formal and Informal Assessment on a Professional Development School for In-Service Non-Credentialed Teachers[J]. Teacher Education Quarterly, Fall 2005, 32(4):62.
  • 7Ye He, et al Improvement: Using a Toward Continuous Program Logic Model for Professional Development School Program Evaluation[J] School-University Partnerships, Spring 2010,4(1): 25.
  • 8Nancy I.Latham W.Paul Vogt. Do Professional Development Schools Reduce Teacher Attrition? Evidence from a Longitudinal Study of 1,000 Graduates[J]. Journal of Teacher Education, March/April 2007, 58(2): 154,p 155-165.
  • 9Janette K. Klingner, et al. Closing the Gap: Enhancing Student Outcomes in an Urban Professional Development School[J]. Teacher Education and Special Education, summer2004,27(3):293.
  • 10NCATE, Standards for Professional Development Schools[EB/OL]., http://www.ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=FcHbf2B%2B670%3D&tabid= 125, Spring 2001,p9-15.

共引文献8

同被引文献25

引证文献1

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部