期刊文献+

高校教学质量保障:困境、新框架与实践检验 被引量:3

Teaching Quality Assurance of Universities:Predicament, New Framework and Practice Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪80年代以来,我国逐步构建了以本科教学评估制度为基础的高校教学质量保障体系,有力保障和提升了高校教学质量,但也存在质量保障理念的外生性、质量保障主体的单一性、质量保障技术的不完善性和质量保障标准的滞后性等困境。基于新时代的高校教学质量发展实际,应构建由理念、主体、技术和标准等构成的高校教学质量保障新框架(ISTS)。东莞理工学院通过创建教学质量指数(TQI)对教学质量保障新框架进行了实践检验。 Since the 1980 s,the teaching quality guarantee systems on the basis of undergraduate teaching evaluation systems of universities were constructed gradually in China,which guaranteed and improved teaching quality,but it also exists some dilemma,including exogeneity of quality assurance concept,single quality assurance subject,imperfect quality assurance technology and hysteretic quality assurance standards,etc.Based on the development of teaching quality of universities in the new era,a new framework for guaranteeing teaching quality in colleges and universities which consists of ideas,subjects,technologies and standards should be constructed.Through establishing the teaching quality index(TQI),Dongguan University of Technology has carried out a practical test on the new framework of teaching quality assurance.
作者 姚宇华 黄彬 陈想平 Yao Yuhua;Huang Bin;Chen Xiangping(Institute of Higher Education Research,ongguan University of Technology;Center for Teaching Supervision and Assessment.Dongguan University of Technology,Dongguan,Guangdong 523808)
出处 《上海教育评估研究》 2019年第6期12-16,共5页 Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
基金 2018年广东省普通高校青年创新人才类项目(人文社科)“知识生产模式转型视域下高水平大学建设研究”(2018WQNCX183) 2017年广东省新工科研究与实践项目“新型高水平理工科大学建设理念、任务及路径研究与实践”(粤教高函[2017]170号-31) 广东省本科高校教育教学改革立项项目“基于OBE理念的地方本科院校教学质量监控体系构建的研究与实践”(粤教高函[2016]236号-509)
关键词 高校教学质量保障 困境 新框架 教学质量指数 Teaching quality assurance of colleges and universities Predicament New framework Teaching quality index
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献77

  • 1王宁.知识分子:从立法者到解释者[J].读书,1992(12):114-118. 被引量:3
  • 2黄福涛.苏联高等教育模式形成的历史考察[J].清华大学教育研究,2002,23(5):57-64. 被引量:15
  • 3祝爱民,郭涛,于丽娟,夏冬.标准化战略的发展趋势[J].科技管理研究,2006,26(2):217-219. 被引量:4
  • 4马陆亭.试析我国高等教育投入制度的改革方向[J].高等教育研究,2006,27(7):51-56. 被引量:39
  • 5CHEA, “recognized Accrediting Organizations” ( as of April 2008). www. chea. org
  • 6Judith Eaton, “The future of accreditation?” .第3页.www.chea. orgo
  • 7Judith Eaton, “Federal policy events and reflections on the ac- creditation- government relationship: Four Points”; Judith Eaton, “Consequences of the commission on the future of higher education: Where do we stand”; Judith Eaton, “The future of accreditation?”www. chea. org. Judith Eaton
  • 8ENQA(2003), “Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. http//: www. enqa. eu
  • 9ENQA, “Quality Procedures in the European Higher Education Area and Beyond Second ENQA Survey”. http//: www. enqa. eu
  • 10Brennan, John, Shah, Tarla, (2000), “Quality assessment and institutional chage: Experience from 14 countries”. Higher Education.

共引文献184

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部