期刊文献+

美国综合课程改革指导框架、实施路径与借鉴 被引量:13

The Guiding Framework, Implementation Path and Enlightenment of American Comprehensive Curriculum Reform
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国综合课程改革注重追求教学价值、育人价值与社会价值的统一,从科内整合、科际整合、跨学科整合、超学科整合四个层面出发构建了多层次、立体化的综合课程体系,并孕育出全语文、社会科、STEM、21世纪主题等多种有代表性的综合课程形态。美国综合课程改革强调从课程理念的高度把握并推动综合课程体系建设,注重综合课程的相关性、严密性和参与性,以保障课程品质,并分类建立了课程标准和指南来保障综合课程的有效实施。值此我国重启义务教育课程标准修订之际,深化综合课程内涵建设应进一步强化课程整合意识,构建全方位、立体化的综合课程育人体系,有针对性地建立综合课程标准和指南,并通过师训、教研等管道提升教师的课程整合能力。 The comprehensive curriculum reform in the United States focuses on the unity of teaching value,education value and social value.In the process of curriculum reform, a multi-dimensional comprehensive curriculum systemic constructed,which includes discipline-integration,interdisciplinary integration, multidisciplinary integration and transdisciplinary integration.This system has also developed a variety of representative comprehensive curriculum forms such as the whole language, social sciences, STEM, and 21 st century themes. In order to ensure the quality of the comprehensive curriculum, America focuses on the relevance,rigor and participation of comprehensive curriculum.Through making the curriculum standards and guidelines, America improves the effective implementation of comprehensive curriculum.On the occasion of the revision of the compulsory education curriculum standards in China, deepening the connotation construction of comprehensive curriculum should strengthen the awareness of curriculum integration, build a comprehensive and multi-dimensional comprehensive curriculum system, and establish comprehensive curriculum standards.Besides,the school should build curriculum integration program and enhance the teachers` curriculum integration ability through school-based training.
作者 刘登珲 LIU Denghui(Tin ka ping school of Education Science,JiangNan University,WuXi,214122)
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第12期94-100,共7页 International and Comparative Education
基金 2016年教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“基于核心素养的课程整合”研究成果之一,项目编号16JJD880022。
关键词 美国 综合课程 指导框架 实施路径 the United States comprehensive curriculum guidance framework implementation path
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献35

  • 1[美]巴格莱著 袁桂林译.教育与新人[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1996..
  • 2Loretta Sullivan Lobes.Surveying State Standards:National History Education Network's 1997 Report on State Social Studies Standards.The History Teacher,1998,31(2):221-234.
  • 3Surveying State Standards:National History Education Network's 1997 Report on State Social Studies Standards.
  • 4E.Wayne Ross.The Social Studies Curriculum.New York:State University of New York:2001.22-24.Jock Zevin.Social Studies For The Twenty-First Century.Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Inc,2000.10-12.
  • 5Francie Alexander and Charlotte Crabtree.California's New History-Social Science Curriculum Promises Richness and Depth.Educational Leadership,1988,46(1):10-13.
  • 6California's New History-Social Science Curriculum Promises Richness and Depth:Charlotte Crabtree.Improving History in the Schools.Education Leadership,1989,47(3):25-28.
  • 7Califomia's New History-Social Science Curriculum Promises Richness and Depth.
  • 8John J. Patrick. The Bradley Commission in the Context of 1980s Curriculum Reform in the Social Studies. The History Teacher, 1989,23(1):37-51.
  • 9The Bradley Commission on History in Schools.. Building a History Curriculum: Guidelines for Teaching History in Schools. The History Teacher, 1989,23 (1):7-35.
  • 10National Standard for United States History, Basic Edition. Los Angeles: National Center for History in the Schools,1996

共引文献6

同被引文献121

引证文献13

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部