期刊文献+

阻塞器功能评价量表中文版的引进授权、翻译回译、语义调适及临床初步验证 被引量:5

Authorization,translation,back translation and language modification of the Chinese version of the obturator functioning scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对阻塞器功能评价量表(obturator functioning scale,OFS)英文版进行引进授权、翻译回译及语义调适,形成中文简体版,并在临床初步验证其信度及效度,为评价我国腭部缺损阻塞器修复患者口腔功能及生命质量提供有效工具.方法对OFS英文版进行正向翻译、综合协调、反向翻译、专家委员会评议,形成包含人口统计学资料、疾病基本情况和进食(3个条目)、语音(5个条目)、其他问题(7个条目)3个维度(共15个条目)的OFS中文版.使用OFS中文版对2016年12月至2018年12月于中山大学光华口腔医学院·附属口腔医院修复科就诊的42例腭部缺损阻塞器修复患者进行口腔功能评估,其中男性26例,年龄21~84岁,女性16例,年龄24~80岁,同时对量表的信度及效度进行检验和分析.结果OFS中文版总表以及进食、语音、其他问题3个维度的克龙巴赫α系数分别为0.926、0.938、0.930、0.935,量表内部一致性较好;各维度与总分的Spearman系数分别为0.677、0.792、0.860,提示量表聚合度较好.15个条目的内容效度为0.905,提示条目内容具有较好的相关性.结论OFS中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评价我国腭部缺损阻塞器修复患者口腔功能以及生命质量的有效工具. Objective To cross-cultural adapt the English version of obturator functioning scale(OFS)to form a simplified Chinese version,to preliminarily verify its reliability and validity in clinic,and to provide an effective tool for evaluating the oral function and quality of life of patients with palatal defect and restored with obturators in China.Methods The English version of the OFS was taken for forward translation,synthesis,back-translation,and reviewed by expert committee to develop a pre-testing simplified Chinese version.This scale contained demographic data,basic information of diseases,eating problems dimensions(3 items),speech problems dimensions(5 items),and other problems dimensions(7 items).From December,2016 to December,2018,forty-two patients who were treated in the Department of Prosthodontics,Guanghua School of Stomatology,Hospital of Stomatology,Sun Yat-sen University with palatal defect and restored with obturators were evaluated with OFS.Among them,there were 26 males,and 21-84 years old,and 16 females,who were 24-80 years old.The reliability and validity of the data were examined and analyzed.Results The results showed that Cronbach′sαcoefficients of the overall scale and the three dimensions(eating problems,speech problems,and other problems)were 0.926,0.938,0.930,and 0.935,respectively.The internal consistency of the questionnaire was very good.The Spearman coefficients between each single dimension and the total score were 0.677,0.792,and 0.860,respectively,suggesting that the scale convergence was good.The content validity index of 15 items was 0.905,indicating that the content validity was very good.Conclusions The Chinese version of the OFS is exhibiting high reliability and validity,providing an effective evaluation tool of oral function and quality of life for Chinese patients with obturator prostheses to restore palate defects.
作者 何依盈 沙秀娟 吴淑仪 李家妍 李彦 He Yiying;Sha Xiujuan;Wu Shuyi;Li Jiayan;Li Yan(Department of Prosthodontics,Guanghua School of Stomatology,Hospital of Stomatology,Sun Yat-sen University&Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology,Guangzhou 510055,China;Department of Stomatology,Nanhai District Seventh People′s Hospital,Foshan 528247,China)
出处 《中华口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第12期835-836,837-840,共6页 Chinese Journal of Stomatology
关键词 腭阻塞器 生活质量 问卷调查 翻译 Palatal obturators Quality of life Questionnaires Translating
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

  • 1Kaplan MH, Feinstein AR. The importance of classifying initial co-morbidity in evaluating the outcome of diabetes mellitus[J]. J Chronic Dis, 1974, 27(7-8): 387-404.
  • 2Gijsen R, Hoeymans N, Schellevis FG, et al. Causes and consequences of comorbidity: a review[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2001, 54(7): 661-674.
  • 3Piccirillo JF, Feinstein AR. Clinical symptoms and comorbidity: significance for the prognostic classification of cancer[J]. Cancer, 1996, 77(5): 834-842.
  • 4Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation[J]. J Chronic Dis, 1987, 40(5):373-383.
  • 5Piccirillo JF, Lacy PD, Basu A, et al. Development of a new head and neck cancer-specific comorbidity index[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2002, 128(10): 1172-1179.
  • 6Pugliano FA, Piccirillo JF, Zequeira MR, et al. Clinical-severity staging system for oral cavity cancer: five-year survival rates[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1999, 1200): 38-45.
  • 7Piccirillo JF, Wells CK, Sasaki CT, et al. New clinical severity staging system for cancer of the larynx. Five-year survival rates [J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1994, 103(2): 83-92.
  • 8Allareddy V, Konety BR. Characteristics of patients and predictors of in-hospital mortality after hospitalization for head and neck cancers[J]. Cancer, 2006, 106(11): 2382-2388. DOI: lO.1002/cncr.21899.
  • 9Reid BC, Warren JL, Rozier G. Comorbidity and early diagnosis of head and neck cancer in a Medicare population [J]. Am J Prey Med, 2004, 27(5): 373-378. DOI: 10.1016/j. amepre.2004.07.018.
  • 10Datema FR, Ferrier MB, van der Schroeff MP, et al. Impact of comorbidity on short-term mortality and overall survival of head and neck cancer patients[J]. Head Neck, 2010, 32(6): 728-736. DOI: 10.1002/bed.21245.

共引文献44

同被引文献37

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部