期刊文献+

学生综合素质评价定位研究 被引量:20

On the Orientation to Students’ Comprehensive Quality Evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 定位是评价主体赋予评价活动一定功能的过程。从评价主体和评价功能两个维度,可以将综合素质评价定位划分为统一的发展性评价、统一的选拔性评价、校本的发展性评价和校本的选拔性评价四种不同模式,每一个评价模式的功能定位各不相同。高考综合改革中学生综合素质评价,应平衡校内与校外两类主体的不同需求,兼顾促进发展与科学选才两方面的功能,使各方面的评价更加协调,破解当前学生综合素质评价诸多实践难题。 Orientation is a process in which the evaluator endows evaluation with certain functions.Based on such dimensions as evaluators and the functions of evaluation,the orientation to comprehensive quality evaluation can fall into four different modes:the unified developmental evaluation,the unified selective evaluation,the school-based developmental evaluation and the school-based selective evaluation,with each mode differing from the others.In the comprehensive reform of the college entrance examination,the evaluation of students'comprehensive competences is supposed to balance the needs of both the evaluators inside the school and those outside the school,and attach equal importance to promoting development and selecting talents scientifically so as to coordinate all aspects of evaluation and solve practical problems in the current evaluation of students'comprehensive competences.
作者 柳夕浪 Liu Xilang(the Faculty of Education,Shandong Normal University,Ji'nan 250014)
出处 《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第11期71-80,共10页 Educational Research
关键词 高考综合改革 综合素质评价 定位比较分析 comprehensive reform of the college entrance examination comprehensive quality evaluation a comparative analysis of orientation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献46

  • 1黄志红.新课程背景下普通高中学生综合素质评价的研究与构想[J].课程.教材.教法,2006,26(11):17-22. 被引量:32
  • 2宋全政.综合素质试水高招录取[N].中国教育报,2009.
  • 3Stevns, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677 - 680.
  • 4Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 50, 9, 741- 749.
  • 5Michell, J. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. Hinsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 6Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 7Camilli, G., & Shepard, L.A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • 8Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing test items to evaluate higher order thinking. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Baon.
  • 9Embretson, S. E. , & Yang, X. (2006). Item response theory. In J, Green, G. Camilli, & P, Elmore (Eds.), Complementary research methods for education, 3rd edition (pp. 385 - 410 ). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • 10American Psychological Association. (1953). Ethical standards for psychologists. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, Inc.

共引文献57

同被引文献256

引证文献20

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部