期刊文献+

经尿道1470nm激光汽化与经尿道电切术治疗前列腺增生疗效及安全性的比较研究

Comparative study on efficacy and safety of transurethral 1470nm laser vaporization and transurethral resection in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经尿道1470 nm激光前列腺汽化与电切术的疗效及安全性。方法将110例前列腺增生(BPH)患者分为两组,激光组60例采用1470 nm激光治疗,电切组50例经尿道电切(TURP)治疗,比较两组的疗效及安全性。结果激光组手术后最大尿流率(Qmax)、手术时间、术中出血量、术后膀胱冲洗时间、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、留置尿管时间均优于电切组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论经尿道1470 nm激光汽化治疗前列腺增生较TURP方法更具优势,可有效改善患者前列腺增生引起下尿路梗阻症状,使患者受益。 Objective To explore efficacy and safety of transurethral 1470 nm laser vaporization and transurethral resection in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH). Methods 110 cases of BPH in our hospital from Aug. 2015 to Aug. 2017 were divided into the laser group and TURP group, 60 cases in the laser group were treated with 1470 nm laser and 50 cases in TURP group were underwent transurethral resection. The efficacy and safety were compared in two groups. Results The Qmax, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bladder washing time,international prostate symptom score(IPSS), indwelling catheter time of the laser group were better than that of the TURP group, and the difference were statistically significant(all P<0.05). Conclusion Transurethral 1470 nm laser vaporization for the BPH is superior to TURP, which can effectively improve the symptoms of lower urinary tract obstruction of BPH and benefit patients.
作者 曹景朝 易正金 王勇 CAO Jing-zhao;YI Zheng-jin;WANG Yong(Urinary Surgery Department of the General Hospital of Panzhihua Iron&Steel Company,Panzhihua,Sichuan,617067,China)
出处 《中国冶金工业医学杂志》 2019年第6期628-629,共2页 Chinese Medical Journal of Metallurgical industry
基金 四川省科技厅基金项目(S16047)
关键词 前列腺增生 1470nm激光汽化 前列腺电切 Benigh prostatic hyperplasia 1470 nm laser vaporization Transurethral resection of prostate
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1郝晓航,赵永伟,刘志峰,刘义东,阮政,王兴亮.经尿道前列腺绿激光“倒八字法”切除术10个月随访[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(4):215-218. 被引量:2
  • 2Rochrborn CU, McConncll JD. Etiology, pathothysiology, cpidc- miology and natural history of benign prostate hyperplasia[M]// Walsh PC, Rctik AB, Vaughan ED Jr. Campbell' s Urology. Philadclphia:WB Saundcrs Company,2002 : 1297-1330.
  • 3Hochreiter WW, Thalmann GN, Burkhard FC, et al. Holmi- um laser enuclertion of the prostate combined with electro- eautery resection the mushroom technique[J]. J Urol,2002, 168 (4 Pt 1) :1470-1474.
  • 4Horasanli K, Silay MS, Altay B, et al. Photoselective potas- sium titanyl-phosphate(KTP) laser vaporization versus tran- surethral resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 70mL: a short-term prospective randomized trial[J]. Urolo- gy,2008,71(2) 247-251.
  • 5Kang SH, Choi YS, Kim SJ, et al. Long-term follow-up re- sults of photoselective vaporization of the prostate with the 120W greenlight HP$ laser for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Korean J Urol, 2011,52 : 260-264.
  • 6Seitz M, Sroka R, Gratzke C, et al. The diode laser a novel side-firing approach for laser vaporisation of the human prostate-- immediate efficacy and 1-year follow-up[J]. Eur Urol, 2007,52 (6) : 1717-1722.
  • 7Youngho Kim, Youl Keun Seong, In Gon Kim, et al. Twelve-month follow-up results of photoselective vaporization of the pros- tate with a 980-nrn diode laser for treatment of benign hyperplasia [J]. Korean J Urol,2013,54(10) .677-681.
  • 8Lee NG, Xue H, Lerner LB. Trends and attitudes in surgical management of benign prostate hyperplasia[j]. Can J Uro[ 2012,19(2) :6170-6175.
  • 9杨德林,柯昌兴,王剑松,左毅刚,颜汝平,王伟,刘靖宇,丁明霞.等离子电切术中不同方法治疗前列腺增生症(附1900例报告)[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2009,3(1):32-35. 被引量:23
  • 10李又空,钱辉军,张茨,胡卫.经尿道120W绿激光前列腺汽化术与前列腺电切术疗效比较[J].中国内镜杂志,2009,15(10):1039-1042. 被引量:10

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部