刑事诉讼中的时空话语权争端与消解

The Dispute of the Right of Speech in Time and Space in Criminal Proceedings and Its Resolution

刑事诉讼以时间和空间作为其存在方式,个案的刑事诉讼就是控辩双方对各自作出的时空选择进行角力的"沉浮"之斗。认罪认罚从宽制度的入法进一步彰显了被追诉人的主体性地位,从以犯罪嫌疑人身份到案,到以被告人身份受审,再到以罪犯身份服刑,被追诉人作出的是否认罪、是否认罚、是否同意适用速裁程序或简易程序、是否上诉等程序性、实体性决定,就是在对刑事诉讼的运行时间、运行空间作出主体性选择,对此公安司法机关在侦查阶段、起诉阶段、审判阶段反应不一。直面公权力与私权利对于刑事诉讼的时空博弈,在认罪认罚从宽制度入法带来的被追诉人诉讼主体化倾向中,有必要对时空冲突现象加以调和,以走向控辩更加平等的时空理想境遇。

Criminal procedure is based on time and space as its way of existence and the criminal procedure of a case is an "ups and downs" struggle between the prosecution and the defense over their respective space-time choices. The admission of guilt and punishment to the lenient system further demonstrates the subjective position of the accused. On one hand, from the role of suspect to defendant and criminal, the choices the accused made about whether plea or not, accept the punishment or not, agree with the fast-track or summary procedure or not and appeal or not are all choices regarding the time and space of criminal procedure. On the other hand, the public security and judicial organs are equipped with various measures in investigating, prosecution and trial stage. In order to tackle the time and space game between the prosecutors and accused, it is bound to reconcile the time and space conflict so that the relationship between the prosecutors and accused can be equal.