H指数在期刊同行评议质量评价中的应用

Application of H-index in the evaluation of peer review

期刊编辑通常依赖于同行审稿专家的建议,对作者提交的学术研究、想法或材料做出决策。同行审稿专家为编辑提供稿件质量的评估,为作者提供建设性的意见。超过80%的受访学者认为期刊同行评议有助于科学交流以及学术期刊质量的提升。然而,同行评议本身存在许多缺点,目前对于如何评价期刊同行评议的质量和有效性没有统一的评价标准。本文重点介绍H指数在同行评议质量评价中的应用,为我国期刊同行评议质量评价提供有价值的新视角。

Journal editors usually rely on the views of independent experts(peers)in making decisions on an author’s scholarly work,research,or ideas and material submitted for publication.The peer reviewer serves the editor by substantiating the quality of the manuscript,and serves the author by giving constructive criticism.More than 80%of surveyed academics agreed that journal peer review greatly helps scientific communication and improves the quality of academic journals.However,there are a lot of shortcomings in peer review,and there appears to be little agreement about how to measure its quality and effectiveness.This paper focuses on the application of H-index in the evaluation of peer review,which will provide a new perspective for the evaluation of the quality of peer review.