期刊文献+

AI法律、法律AI及“第三道路” 被引量:34

Artificial Intelligence Law, Artificial Intelligentization of Law and “the Third Way”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,我国关于法律与人工智能的研究成果颇丰,并呈现出两种研究进路。AI法律进路旨在把AI纳入法律规制框架之内,而法律AI进路则力图把法律转化为智能系统,这就决定了二者不同的方向与立场、领域与路径,也带来了不同的问题与前景。深入分析表明,我们需要从浪漫理想回归现实主义,开辟汇合二者、扬长避短的"第三道路",增强法学与技术的对话合作,促进法律与人工智能的双向融合,从而有效推进法律与人工智能领域的深入研究。 There are so many research fruits about law and AI these years and they present two research approaches. Approach of artificial intelligence law aims at bringing AI into legal regulation structure, while artificial intelligentization approach of law intents to transfer law into intelligent system. They have different directions and standpoints, and bring different problems and futures. Deeper analysis shows we need return realism from romantic ideal and open up a third way to join these two approaches and make good use of their advantages and bypass their disadvantages. In the third way, we strengthen the conversation and cooperation between law and technology, and improve two-way fusion of law and AI, so as to effectively advance deep research of law and AI field.
作者 马长山 Ma Changshan(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第12期4-11,155,共9页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金 研究阐释党的十九大精神国家社科基金专项课题——“新时代共建共治共享的社会治理法治化机制研究”(18VSJ033)的阶段性成果之一
关键词 数字社会 算法 人工智能法律 法律人工智能 digital society algorithm artificial intelligence law artificial intelligentization of law
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献59

共引文献874

同被引文献690

引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部