期刊文献+

基于正交试验接骨螺钉参数的生物相容性评价 被引量:1

Orthopedic screw parameters in the orthogonal test: biocompatibility evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:当前骨科螺钉参数研究多集中于力学性能方面,缺少对其生物相容性的评估。目的:探究接骨螺钉材料属性及几何参数对生物相容性的影响规律,探求各因素及水平的最佳组合,为接骨螺钉的设计提供理论参考。方法:针对接骨螺钉5个因素的3个水平进行正交试验方案设计,因素A为螺钉直径(4.5,5.5,6.5 mm),因素B为螺纹牙型(矩形、梯形、三角形),因素C为螺钉螺距(1.75,2.25,2.75 mm),因素D为螺纹深度(0.5,1.0,1.5 mm),因素E为弹性模量(45,110,200 GPa),分别对18组不同螺钉参数下的骨-钉三维模型进行生物力学有限元分析,得出各组试验方案下的应力分布情况及2个试验指标值:皮质骨-螺钉之间的应力传递参数STPα,松质骨-螺钉之间的应力传递参数STPβ。利用权矩阵分析方法对正交试验数据进行分析进而得出影响规律及最佳组合。结果与结论:不同因素的不同水平对于生物相容性影响程度不同,其中螺钉材料属性为最主要影响因素,其次是螺纹牙型、螺距和螺纹直径并且三者影响程度相近,而螺纹深度影响最小。正交试验所得最佳组合方案为大径为6.5 mm、梯形螺纹、螺距为2.75 mm、螺纹深度为0.5 mm、弹性模量为45 GPa的接骨螺钉。 BACKGROUND:Most current studies of orthopedic screw parameters focus on mechanical properties but lack biocompatibility assessment.OBJECTIVE:To investigate the influence of geometric parameters and material properties of orthopedic screws on biomechanical compatibility,explore the optimal combination of various factors and parameterization levels,providing a theoretical reference for the design of orthopedic screws.METHODS:An orthogonal experiment protocol was designed according to the five factors and three parameterization levels of orthopedic screws.Factor A was the screw diameter(4.5,5.5,6.5 mm),factor B was thread profile(rectangular,trapezoidal,triangular),factor C was screw pitch(1.75,2.25,2.75 mm),factor D was the thread depth(0.5,1.0,1.5 mm),and factor E was elastic modulus(45,110,200 GPa).The biomechanical finite element analysis of the three-dimensional bone-nail model under different sets of screw parameters was carried out.Stress distribution and two experimental indicators(the stress transfer parameter STPαbetween the cortical bone and the screw,and the stress transfer parameter STPβbetween the cancellous bone and the screw)under different experimental schemes were obtained.The weighted matrix analysis method was used to analyze the orthogonal experimental data to obtain the influence law and the optimal combination.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Different levels of different factors have different degrees of influence on biocompatibility.Among them,the screw material properties are the most important factors,followed by the thread profile,pitch and thread diameter,and the last was the thread depth.The thread profile,pitch,and thread diameter had similar influence on biocompatibility.The optimal combination of the orthogonal experiment was an orthopedic screw with a large diameter of 6.5 mm,a trapezoidal thread,a pitch of 2.75 mm,a thread depth of 0.5 mm,and an elastic modulus of 45 GPa.
作者 龙登燕 纪爱敏 赵仲航 方润心 陈长胜 Long Dengyan;Ji Aimin;Zhao Zhonghang;Fang Runxin;Chen Changsheng(College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,Hohai University,Changzhou 213022,Jiangsu Province,China;Changzhou Orthmed Medical Instrument Co.,Ltd.,Changzhou 213000,Jiangsu Province,China)
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第10期1574-1579,共6页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目(2019B63914),项目负责人:纪爱敏 江苏省研究生科研与实践创新项目(SJKY19_0435),项目负责人:纪爱敏~~
关键词 接骨螺钉 生物相容性 应力传递参数 有限元分析 正交试验 直观分析 方差分析 权矩阵方法 orthopedic screw biocompatibility stress transfer parameter finite element analysis orthogonal experiment intuitive analysis analysis of variance weight matrix method
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献49

  • 1石奉文,王以进.骨伤科中的康复生物力学[J].生物力学,1989,4(6):66-67. 被引量:3
  • 2宋富立,靳安民,王瑞,张辉,童斌辉,姚伟涛.椎弓根螺钉内固定术后螺钉松动原因临床分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(5):319-319. 被引量:10
  • 3庄全魁,孟晓林,时合同,艾继超,芮清伟,吴刚强,陈勇.颗粒骨植骨在椎弓根钉翻修术中的应用[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(5):400-400. 被引量:2
  • 4徐树柏.使用决策方法-层次分析法原理[M].天津大学出版社,1991,10:3.
  • 5复旦大学编.概率论[N].高等教育出版社,1985,4:1.
  • 6Christen SB ,Dalstra M ,Sejling F,et al. Titanium-alloy enhances bone- pedicle screw fixation:mechanical and histomorphometerical results of titanium-alloy versus stainless steel [J]. Eur Spine J,2000,9 (2):97- 103.
  • 7Eulenberger J,Steinemann SG. Removal torques of small screws of steel and titanium with different surfaces[J]. Unfallchirurg, 1990,93 (3):96- 99.
  • 8Sanden B,Olerudc D,Jhohansson C,et al. Improved bone-screw inter- face with hydroxyapatite coating an in vitro study of loaded pedicle screws in sheep[J]. Spine,2001,26(24) :2673-2678.
  • 9Klein SA, Glassman SD. Evaluation of the fixation and strength of a "rescue" revision pedicle screw[J]. 2002,15 (2) : 100-104.
  • 10Hale JE, Baker DV. Comparison of pullout characteristics for two ta- pered bone screws[J]. The 20th annual meeting of the American society of biomechanics, 1996,10 : 17-19.

共引文献87

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部