期刊文献+

超声引导下椎旁神经阻滞治疗带状疱疹相关疼痛的Meta分析 被引量:16

Ultrasound-guided paravertebral nerve block for zoster-associated pain: a Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:目前临床研究显示超声引导下椎旁神经阻滞治疗胸腰段带状疱疹相关疼痛有显著效果,并在临床上得到了广泛使用。目的:系统评价超声引导下椎旁神经阻滞治疗胸腰段带状疱疹相关疼痛的有效性及安全性,为临床治疗提供参考依据。方法:检索PubMed、The Cochrane Library、EMBASE、CNKI、WanFang Data、VIP以及CBM等数据库,检索时限为建库至2019-01-01。根据制定的纳入和排除标准,收集有关超声引导下椎旁神经阻滞治疗及药物治疗胸腰段带状疱疹急性期疼痛或带状疱疹后神经痛的随机对照试验,以超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞组作为实验组,药物治疗组或传统椎旁神经阻滞组作为对照组。依据Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0偏倚风险评估工具评价纳入文献质量。通过Revman 5.3软件对文献数据进行Meta分析。结果与结论:①最终纳入11项随机对照试验研究文献,共916例受试者;②Meta分析结果显示:与对照组相比,超声引导下椎旁神经阻滞组的镇痛效果更好,在1-4周内临床镇痛效果最佳,采用随机效应模型下分析,1周:MD=-0.91,95%CI(-1.22,-0.61),P<0.00001;2周:MD=-1.11,95%CI(-1.52,-0.70),P<0.00001;3周:MD=-1.26,95%CI(-1.79,-0.74),P<0.00001;4周:MD=-0.90,95%CI(-1.57,-0.24),P=0.007;同时睡眠质量及治疗有效率均有提高[固定效应模型下分析,OR=3.63,95%CI(2.38,5.53),P<0.00001],统计结果差异有显著性意义,并且具有未增加整个治疗过程的不良反应等优点;③结果说明,超声引导下椎旁神经阻滞治疗胸腰段带状疱疹相关疼痛是安全和有效的。 BACKGROUND:Current studies have shown that ultrasound-guided paravertebrospinal nerve block widely used has a significant effect in the clinical treatment of thoracolumbar zoster-associated pain.OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided paravertebral nerve block in the treatment of thoracolumbar zoster-associated pain and to provide reference for clinical treatment.METHODS:We searched relevant literature in PubMed,The Cochrane Library,EMBASE,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),WanFang Data,China Science and Technology Journal Database(VIP)and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database(CBM).The limit of searching time was from inception until January 1,2019.Randomized controlled trials addressing ultrasound-guided paravertebral nerve block(experimental group)versus drug therapy(control group)for the treatment of acute zoster-associated pain or postherpetic neuralgia were collected according to the criteria for inclusion and exclusion.Literature quality was assessed according to Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 bias risk assessment tool.The literature data were analyzed using Revman 5.3 software through a Meta-analysis.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:A total of 11 randomized controlled trials involving 916 patients met the inclusion criteria.The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group,the ultrasound-guided paravertebral nerve block group had better analgesic effect and the optimal analgesic effect appeared within 1-4 weeks.A random effects model was then used[1st week:mean difference(MD)=-0.91,95%confidence interval(CI)(-1.22,-0.61),P<0.00001;2nd week:MD=-1.11,95%CI(-1.52,-0.70),P<0.00001;3rd week:MD=-1.26,95%CI(-1.79,-0.74),P<0.00001;4th week:MD=-0.90,95%CI(-1.57,-0.24),P=0.007].At the same time,the quality of sleep and the effective rate of treatment were improved,and a fixed effects model was used[odds ratio=3.63,95%CI(2.38,5.53),P<0.00001].The statistical results showed significant difference.There was no increase in post-treatment adverse reactions.Therefore,ultrasound-guided paravertebral nerve block is safe and effective for the treatment of zoster-associated pain in the thoracolumbar region.
作者 宋旭东 何云武 李勇霖 陈静 胡君兰 Song Xudong;He Yunwu;Li Yonglin;Chen Jing;Hu Junlan(Department of Pain,Second Affiliated Hospital of University of South China,Hengyang 421001,Hunan Province,China)
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第11期1797-1804,共8页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
关键词 组织构建 神经组织工程 超声 椎旁神经阻滞 带状疱疹 带状疱疹后神经痛 META分析 tissue construction nerve tissue engineering ultrasound paravertebral nerve block herpes zoster postherpetic neuralgia Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献85

  • 1朱月萍.顽固性眼带状疱疹后神经痛临床治疗及随访观察[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2003,9(3):134-137. 被引量:27
  • 2方玲玲.带状疱疹后遗神经痛的预防及治疗进展[J].中国医学文摘(皮肤科学),2010,27(2):81-83. 被引量:12
  • 3薛志兴,樊碧发.带状疱疹后遗神经痛的诊疗现状[J].中日友好医院学报,2006,20(3):187-189. 被引量:32
  • 4YUKO K, KEIKO 0, KEITA F, et al. Predictive factors forpostherpetic neuralgia using ordered logistic regression analysis[J]. Clin J Pain, 2012,28(8) :712 -714.
  • 5A RANI RB, S00NG S, WEISS HLf et al. Phase specific analy-sis of herpes zoster associated pain data: a new statistical ap-proach[J]. Stat Med, 2001, 20(6): 2429 -2439.
  • 6HONORIO B,KIRAN C,AMIT D,et al. The prevention andmanagement of postherpetic neuralgia with emphasis on interven-tional procedures [ J ]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2009,34 ( 5 ):514 -521.
  • 7MARK P, YU-KUN C, JACQUELINE W. Assessment of painquality in a clinical trial of gabapentin extended release forpostherpetic neuralgia[ J]. Clin J Pain,2009 , 25(2) : 286 -292.
  • 8TREED RD, JENSEN TS,CAMPBELL JN, et al. Neuropathicpain : redefinition and a grading system for clinical and researchpurposes[ J]. Neurology, 2008 , 29(4):1630 - 1635.
  • 9ALI M,BEHRANG N, MUSTAFA S, et al. An ultra-low dose ofnaloxone added to lidocaine or lidocaine-fentanyl mixture pro-longs axillary brachial plexus blockade[ J]. Anesth Analg, 2009,109(7) :1679 - 1683.
  • 10GORDON I,MARK J, MARILOU C, et al. Efficacy and tolera-bility of gastric-retentive gabapentin for the treatment of posther-petic neuralgia: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial[ J]. Clin J Pain、2009 , 25(2) :185 - 192.

共引文献73

同被引文献156

引证文献16

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部