《盐铁论》中御史大夫和贤良文学的王霸之辩

Salt-iron Theory the Defense of the Imperial and the Good-and-good Literature

《盐铁论》是汉宣帝时期的桓宽,根据盐铁会议留下的文字材料,推演整理形成的政论性散文集。主要由御史大夫桑弘羊和贤良文学的对话组成,针对盐铁官营、酒类专卖、平准均输制度的废立展开辩论,集中展现了御史大夫和贤良文学所代表的两个集团的价值冲突和利益对立,反映出西汉前期文学政策和文学思想的演变。本文立足于自秦汉之际到后武帝时代的历史大背景,运用比较研究的方法分析了盐铁会议背后御史大夫和贤良文学之间有关义利的价值观冲突、王霸的政治矛盾,以及中央和地方的权力斗争的种种激辩,将此作为思想界对政治经济激烈变动冲突的总结对现实具有借鉴意义。

Salt and Iron Theory is a collection of political essays,which was deduced and sorted out according to the written materials left by the Salt and Iron Conference during the period of Emperor Xuandi of Han Dynasty.The Theory of Salt and Iron is mainly composed of the dialogue between the imperial historian,San Hongyang,and Xianliang's literature.In view of the abolition of salt and iron official camp and liquor monopoly system,this paper focuses on the value conflict and interest opposition between the two groups represented by imperial historian and Xianliang literature,and reflects the evolution of literary policy and literary thought in the early Western Han Dynasty.Based on the historical background from the Qin and Han dynasties to the post-Wudi era,this paper analyzes the imperial historian and Xianliang literature behind the Salt and Iron Conference by means of comparative study.The conflict of values between righteousness and benefit,the political contradiction between Wang BA and the power struggle between the central and local governments,as a summary of the fierce political and economic changes in the ideological circles,is of reference significance to reality.