期刊文献+

工作需求与家庭支持型主管行为对员工幸福感的双路径影响 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于资源保持理论并结合工作需求-资源模型,本研究探讨了工作需求和家庭支持型主管行为影响员工幸福感的具体路径,以及工作-家庭冲突的中介效应。研究发现,工作需求能够正向影响情绪耗竭、负向影响工作满意度;家庭支持型主管行为能够负向影响情绪耗竭、正向影响工作满意度;工作-家庭冲突完全中介工作需求和工作满意度之间的关系,部分中介工作需求与情绪耗竭之间的关系;工作-家庭冲突部分中介家庭支持型主管行为和情绪耗竭、工作满意度之间的关系。因此,企业应关注员工的家庭需求,避免过高的工作需求,并给予员工家庭方面的支持,以帮助其平衡好工作和家庭并提升幸福感。 Based on COR theory and JDR model,this paper investigates the specific path of job demand and family supportive supervisor behavior affecting employees’well-being,as well as the intermediary effect of work-family conflict.Results show that,job demand affects emotional exhaustion positively and job satisfaction negatively;FSSB affects emotional exhaustion negatively and job satisfaction positively.WFC fully mediates the relations between job demand and job satisfaction,and partially mediates the relations between job demand and emotional exhaustion.WFC partially mediates the relations among FSSB,emotional exhaustion and job satisfaction.Therefore,enterprises should pay attention to the family demands of employees,avoid excessive job demands,and give employees family support to help them balance work and family and improve well-being.
出处 《企业经济》 北大核心 2019年第12期96-102,共7页 Enterprise Economy
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“内外部多重网络交互情境下自组织团队持续创造力研究”(项目编号:18BGL126) 广东省教育厅青年创新人才类项目“‘心有灵犀’有效吗?基于匹配视角的家庭支持型主管行为的影响机制研究”(项目编号:2018WQNCX049) 广州市社会科学规划项目“家和万事兴:家庭支持型主管行为对下属幸福感的影响研究”(项目编号:2018GZGJ54)
关键词 工作需求 家庭支持型主管行为 工作-家庭冲突 情绪耗竭 工作满意度 job demand family supportive supervisor behavior work-family conflict emotional exhaustion job satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献39

  • 1罗耀平,范会勇,张进辅.工作-家庭冲突的前因、后果及干预策略[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(6):930-937. 被引量:47
  • 2Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. JournM of VocationM Behavior, 58, 414-435.
  • 3Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Effering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A recta-analysis of work-family conflict and various,outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of OccupationM Health Psychology, 16, 151-169.
  • 4Bagger, J., & Li, A. (2011). How does supervisory family support influence employees' attitudes and behaviors? A social exchange perspective.Journal of Management, 40, 1123-1150.
  • 5Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical eonsideration Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  • 6Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., & Klesh, J. (1983). Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire. Assessing Organizational Change: A Guide to Methods, Measures, and Practices, 40, 71-138.
  • 7Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M.,Wayne, J. H., &Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. Journal o Vocational Behavior, 68, 131-164.
  • 8Dearing, E., & Hamilton, L C. (2006). Contemporary advances and classic advice for analyzing mediating and moderating variables. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71, 88-104.
  • 9Demerouti, E. (2012). The spillover and crossover of resources among partners: The role of work-self and family-self facilitation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 184-195.
  • 10Frone, M. R., & Yardley, J. K. (1996). Workplace family-supportive programmes: Predictors of employed parents' importance ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 351-366.

共引文献102

同被引文献66

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部