期刊文献+

党内法规对公职人员清廉感知的影响——基于2015年中国综合社会调查的分析 被引量:1

How Do Inner-Party Regulations Affect Perceptions of Public Official’s Corruption: Evidence from CGSS 2015
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当今,中国正从党内法规着手进行廉政建设,相继提出"八项规定""反四风""党规党纪严于国家法律"等制度与理念,但党内法规能否真正利于廉政建设,是否真正能提升公职人员清廉形象,以促进公众对此群体清廉感知评价的提升呢?CGSS2015的数据分析显示:整体上,党内法规对公职人员清廉感知有比较显著的正向影响。具体上,党内法规中,党组织办事人员的遵纪守法情况、党员总体的遵纪守法情况、违反党规党纪的行为在实践中是否受到严肃处理对公职人员清廉感知有显著的正向影响。 Today,China is cultivating an honest and clean government by inner-party regulations.China has put forward the systems of“eight provisions”,“anti Si-Feng”and the idea of“party disciplines is stricter than the state laws”.But whether the inner-party regulations can truly help the construction of a honest and clean government?Whether it can truly improve the honest image of public officials?Whether it can truly improve the perceptions of public Official's corruption?This study shows that,overall,the inner-party regulations have a significant positive impact on perceptions of public Official's corruption.Specifically,whether the staff abide the laws or not,whether the general party members abide the laws or not,and whether the violation behavior have been punished or not have a significant positive impact on perceptions of public Official's corruption.However,the party organization leaders have no significant positive effect on perceptions of public Official's corruption.This study also shows that,whether the common staff abides the laws and disciplines or not,has an insignificant reverse effect on perceptions of public Official's corruption.
作者 梁江禄 Liang Jianglu
出处 《南方治理评论》 2019年第1期116-131,224,共17页 SOUTH CHINA GOVERNANCE REVIEW
基金 广西高校中青年教师基础能力提升项目“党内法规对公职人员清廉感知的影响研究——基于百色市的调查”的支持,项目编号:2019KY0746
关键词 党内法规 公职人员 清廉感知 CGSS Inner-party Regulations Public Officers Perceptions of Corruption CGSS
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献143

  • 1胡鞍钢,过勇.国际组织对各国腐败状况的评价体系概述[J].政治学研究,2001(4):89-91. 被引量:22
  • 2倪星.政府合法性基础的现代转型与政绩追求[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2006,46(4):81-87. 被引量:73
  • 3阎云翔.差序格局与中国文化的等级观[J].社会学研究,2006(4):201-213. 被引量:360
  • 4Lambsdorff,J. Graf,2006. Corruption and Reform of Institutional Economics:Theory, Evidence and Policy. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Transparency International,2011. "Bribe Payers Index 2011. "Available at : http ://bpi. transparency, org/ bpi2011.
  • 6Ades, A. & Di Tella, R. 1999. "Rents, Competition and Corruption. "The American Economic Review. 89 (4) :982 -93.
  • 7Anderson, C. J. & Matthew, M.S. 2008. "The Sensitive Left and the Impervious Right:Multilevel Mod- els and the Politics of Inequality, Ideology, and Legitimacy in Europe. "Comparative Political Studies. 41 (4/ 5) :564 -99.
  • 8Arnold, Jason Ross. 2012. "Political awareness, corruption perceptions anddemocratic accountability m Latin America. "Acta Politica. 47( 1 ) :67 -90.
  • 9Bratton, M. & Mattes, R. 2001. "Support for Democracy in Africa:Intrinsic or Instrumental. British Journal of Political Science. 31 (3) :447 - 74.
  • 10Chang, E. C. C. & Chu, Y. H. 2006. "Corruption and Trust:Exceptionalism in Asian Democracies. The Journal of Politics. 68 (2) :259 - 71.

共引文献172

同被引文献19

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部