裁判文书说理释法的路径选择

Path Selection of Reasons in the Judgment Documents

当前不少法官撰写法律文书时有意识地减少说理的比例和频率,法官“不会说理、不敢说理、不想说理”的现象正在“稀释”法院规范裁判文书释法工作的效用。裁判文书说理有助于提高裁判的可接受性,提高司法公信力和权威,助推司法系统的改革和进步。从构建裁判文书说理标准与质量的体系、建立裁判文书专业化转型激励机制、法官法律技术方法培训常态化等三个方面提出强化裁判文书说理的路径建议。

The investigation found that many judges consciously reduce the proportion and frequency of reasoning when writing legal documents.The phenomenon that judges do not reason,dare not reason,and do not want to reason is diluting the effectiveness of courts in regulating the interpretation of judgment documents.The reasoning of the ruling documents helps to improve the acceptability of rulings.increase the credibility and authority of the judiciary,and promote the reform and progress of the judicial system.This article mainly puts forward suggestions from three aspects:constructing the system of the reasoning standards and quality of referee documents.establishing an incentive mechanism for the professional transformation of referee documents,and normalizing the training of judges legal methods.