期刊文献+

洪水诱发下化工园区储罐失效概率研究分析 被引量:2

Study and Analysis on the Failure Probability of the Storage Tank in the Chemical Park under the Influence of Flood Disaster
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究洪水灾害作用下化工园区储罐事故的演化机理,首先进行危险因素识别,然后建立了洪水诱发下化工园区储罐事故演化Bowtie模型,结合已有文献数据开展实证分析,得到了立式、卧式储罐蒸气云爆炸、闪燃、泄漏、火球和池火灾事件发生概率。计算结果表明,洪水深度相比于洪水速度对立式、卧式储罐失效泄漏各结果事件发生概率影响更为明显;洪水情景1#的高深度洪水诱发下常压立式储罐相对于卧式储罐更容易发生事故;除了泄漏事件,常压储罐火灾爆炸等后果事件概率要大于加压储罐,且泄漏事件是所有结果事件中发生概率最大的事件。 In this paper,the evolution mechanism of the storage tank accidents that are resulted from flood disaster in the chemical park.Firstly,the hazards were identified through analyzing the influence factors.Secondly,the Bowtie model of the tank accident was established.Finally,the occurrence probability of accident such as vapor cloud explosion,flash fire,leakage,fireball and pool fire was obtained based on previous data.The results show that the flood’s deep is more distinct to give rise to the occurrence of tank leakage than the flood’s speed;vertical tank is easier to incur an accident than the horizontal one under the atmospheric pressure in the scenario 1;the occurrence probability of fire and explosion in atmospheric tank is higher than that of pressure tank in addition to leakage accident;and the leakage has the highest probability in the all events.
作者 陈文瑛 李启华 CHEN Wenying;LI Qihua(School of Management and Engineering,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijng 100070,China)
出处 《安全》 2019年第12期48-53,共6页 Safety & Security
关键词 洪水 储罐 Bowtie模型 事故演化机理 发生概率 flood storage tank Bowtie model accident evolution mechanism occurrence probability
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献44

  • 1张琳,李长俊,苏欣,廖柯熹.模糊层次分析法确定管线风险因素权重[J].石油机械,2006,34(6):43-45. 被引量:49
  • 2董玉革,朱文予,陈心昭.模糊故障树分析及应用[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),1996,19(4):35-41. 被引量:29
  • 3Relex Software Co.& Intellect.可靠性实用指南[M].陈晓彤,等译.北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2005,7.
  • 4Daycock J. H. , Rew P. J. Development of a Method for the Determination of On-site Ignition Probabilities[ M]. Epsom: UK HSE,2004.
  • 5Committee for the Prevention of Disasters. Methods for Determining and Processing Probabilities (Red Book) , CPR 12E[ M]. Hague :PGS, 1997.
  • 6Committee for the Prevention of Disasters. Guide Lines for Quantitative Risk Assessment (Purple Book), CPR 1SE[M]. Hague : PGS,2005.
  • 7The European Commission. ARAMIS project : Accidental Risk Assessment Methodology for Industries in the Context of the Seveso ii Directive [R]. Brussels: The European Commission, 2004.100.
  • 8Juan A.V. Generic event trees and probabilities for the release of different types of hazardous materials[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2011,24(3) :281 -287.
  • 9Mike Moosemiller. Development of algorithms for predicting ignition probabilities and explosion frequencies[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2011,24 (3) : 259 - 265.
  • 10US Environmental Protection Agency. Risk Assessment of Storage and Transport of Liquefied Natural Gas and LP-Gas[R]. Washington: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1974.

共引文献64

同被引文献21

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部