期刊文献+

股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的手术时机 被引量:10

Operation timing of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the advanced age
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的手术时机,以减少并发症。[方法]回顾性分析2017年1月~2018年8月南通大学附属南京江北人民医院骨科中心符合标准的136例高龄(≥75岁)股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床资料,按照手术时机分为≤48 h组及>48 h组,对比分析两组患者疗效。[结果]两组患者均顺利手术,其中>48 h组有6例闭合复位不佳,而≤48 h组有2例闭合复位不佳。两组在手术时间、术中出血量、术中输血量、术后输血量方面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但≤48 h组住院时间及住院费用明显低于>48 h组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在并发症方面,≤48h组在肺部感染、静脉血栓、泌尿道感染、心功能障碍、压疮的发生方面明显低于>48 h组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而在肺栓塞的发生、围术期死亡率、急性脑梗死方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者均获得6~18个月随访,平均(12.42±1.54)个月,随时间延长,两组患者临床症状、体征和功能均逐步改善。两组患者在骨折愈合时间、发生再次骨折及内固定松动方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但末次随访时≤48 h组的髋关节功能Harris评分及优良率显著高于>48 h组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]对高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者48 h内积极行手术治疗,可明显降低术后并发症的发生率。 [Objective] To explore the optimal operation timing of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA) for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the advanced age to reduce complications. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 136 patients who were old equal to or more than 75 years, and underwent close reduction and internal fixation with PFNA for femoral intertrochanteric fracture from January 2017 to August 2018 in our department. Based on time elapsed between injury and operation, the patients were divided into the ≤48 h group and the >48 h group. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. [Results] All the patients in both groups had operation performed smoothly with improper close fracture reduction in6 patients of the >48 h group, while only 2 of the ≤48 h group. Although no statistically significant differences were noted regarding operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusion and postoperative transfusion between the two groups(P>0.05), the ≤ 48 h group spent significantly shorter hospital stay and significantly less hospital expenses than the >48 h group(P<0.05). Regarding to complications,the ≤48 h group had significantly lower incidence of pulmonary infection, venous thrombosis, urinary tract infection,cardiac dysfunction and pressure sore than the >48 h group(P<0.05), whereas no significant differences were found in incidence of pulmonary embolism, perioperative death, and acute cerebral infarction between them(P>0.05). The patients in both groups were followed up for 6~18 months with an average of(12.42±1.54) months. As time went postoperatively, the patients in both groups achieved considerable improvements in symptoms, sign and function. Despite of the facts that no significant differences were noticed in fracture healing time, incidence of refracture and implant loosening between the two groups, the ≤48 h group had significantly higher Harris score than the >48 h group at the latest follow-up(P<0.05). [Conclusion] As soon as thorough preoperative evaluation and active preoperative preparation finished, the internal fixation with PFNA should be performed for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in advanced age within 48 hours to reduce complication.
作者 刘小雷 王炎 丁志勇 苑海洋 郑勇 史法见 田纪伟 LIU Xiao-lei;WANG Yan;DING Zhi-yong;YUAN Hai-yang;ZHENG Yong;SHI Fa-jian;TIAN Ji-wei(Department of Orthopedics,Nanjing Jiangbei People's Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University,Nanjing 210048,China)
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第24期2218-2222,共5页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 高龄 股骨粗隆间骨折 股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA) 手术时机 femoral intertrochanteric fracture proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA) operation timing advanced age
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献212

  • 1杨惠林,顾晓晖,陈亮,陆俭,毛海青,孟斌,牛国旗,赵刘军,唐天驷.后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性脊柱骨折的选择性与个体化[J].中国医学科学院学报,2005,27(2):174-178. 被引量:37
  • 2周德定,李延红,卢伟.社区老年人跌倒危险因素研究进展[J].环境与职业医学,2007,24(1):87-91. 被引量:36
  • 3Nikolaou VS,Papathanasopoulos A,Giannoudis PV.What's newin the management of proximal femoral fractures[J].Injury,2008,39:12:1309-1318.
  • 4Liberati A,Altman DG,Tetzlaff J,et al.The PRISMA statementfor reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies thatevaluate health care interventions:explanation and elaboration[J].Ann Intern Med,2009,151:65-94.
  • 5Julian PT,Higgins SG.Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviewsof interventions 5.1.0[Updated March 2011] :the CochraneCollaboration,2011.
  • 6Xu YZ,Geng DC,Mao HQ,et al.A comparison of the proximalfemoral nail antirotation device and dynamic hip screw in thetreatment of unstable pertrochanteric fracture[J].J Int Med Res,2010,38:1266-1275.
  • 7Garg B,Marimuthu K,Kumar V,et al.Outcome of shortproximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw forfixation of unstable trochanteric fractures:a randomisedprospective comparative trial[J].Hip International,2011,21:531-536.
  • 8Stem R,Lubbeke A,Suva D,et al.Prospective randomised studycomparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energytrochanteric fractures[J].Int Orthop,2011,35:1855-1861.
  • 9Zou J,Xu Y,Yang H.A comparison of proximal femoral nailantirotation and dynamic hip screw devices in trochanteric fractures[J].J Int Med Res,2009,37:1057-1064.
  • 10Simmonds MC,Higgins JP,Stewart LA,et al.Meta-analysis ofindividual patient data from randomized trials:a review of methodsused in practice[J].Clin Trials,2005,3:209-217.

共引文献609

同被引文献110

引证文献10

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部