期刊文献+

关系自尊量表测评中学生人群的效度和信度 被引量:5

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Relational Self-esteem Scale(RSES) in Chinese Middle School Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:考察中文版关系自尊量表(relational self-esteem scale,RSES)在中学生群体中应用的效度和信度。方法:调查了816名中学生,用以检验中文版RSES的结构效度、聚合和区分效度、内部一致性和组合信度等。另用罗森博格自尊量表、集体自尊量表、Beck抑郁量表第2版在191名中学生中检验效标关联效度。间隔2周后抽取135名中学生进行重测。结果:在中学生群体中,中文版RSES呈现出家人关系自尊和朋友关系自尊的两维结构,共8个条目,两因子模型拟合良好(χ^2/df=2.546,CFI=0.949,TLI=0.926,RMSEA=0.070,SRMR=0.043)。中文版RSES两因子的AVE均大于0.5,CR均大于0.7,且CR>AVE>MSV,因子间相关系数(0.641)小于AVE。关系自尊均与个体自尊、集体自尊存在显著正相关,与抑郁呈显著负相关。总量表及家人和朋友关系自尊分量表的内部一致性信度分别为0.848、0.729、0.804,重测信度分别为0.784、0.703、0.761,家人和朋友关系自尊分量表的组合信度分别为0.814、0.839。结论:中文版RSES在中学生群体中具有良好的信效度,可以用来测量中学生的关系自尊。 Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of the Relational self-esteem Scale(RSES) in Chinese middle school students. Methods: 816 middle school students were asked to complete the Chinese version of the RSES, in which 191 students were additional asked to complete the Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale, the collective self-esteem questionnaire, and the Beck’s depression scale-II. 135 students were followed to complete the Chinese version of RSES after 2 weeks. Results: The Chinese version of RSES was consisted of 8 items and two factors: family-related self-esteem, and friend-related self-esteem. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-factor model of RSES provided good fit with the data(χ^2/df=2.546, CFI=0.949, TLI=0.926, RMSEA=0.070, SRMR=0.043). The composite reliability, average variance extract, maximum shared variance and average shared variance index of RSES were good fit the psychometrics standards.Self-esteem was correlated with eating personal self-esteem, collective self-esteem, and depression. The Cronbach’s α of all factors ranged from 0.729 to 0.848, the composite reliability ranged from 0.814 and 0.839, the test-retest reliabilities ranged from 0.703 to 0.784. There were significant differences in the relational self-esteem between gender. Conclusion:The Chinese version of RSES is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the relational self-esteem in Chinese middle school students.
作者 刘勇 张德凡 许勇 赵思琦 赵建芳 张守臣 LIU Yong;ZHANG De-fan;XU Yong;ZHAO Si-qi;ZHAO Jian-fang;ZHANG Shou-chen(School of Educational Science,Harbin Normal University,Harbin 150025,China;Jiamusi University,Jiamusi 154047,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第6期1187-1191,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 黑龙江省哲学社会科学规划年度项目(17SHC132) 黑龙江省普通本科高等学校青年创新人才培养计划(UNPYSCT-2017150) 2017年度省属高校基本科研业务费科研项目(2017-KYYWF-0551) 黑龙江省教育科学规划办“十三五”规划2018年度重点课题(GBB1318122)
关键词 关系自尊 效度 信度 Relational self-esteem Validity Reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献137

  • 1车丽萍.国外关于自信的研究综述[J].心理科学进展,2002,10(4):418-424. 被引量:103
  • 2王登峰.自我和谐量表的编制[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1994,2(1):19-22. 被引量:546
  • 3杨宜音.“社会认同的理论与经验研究”工作坊召开研讨会[J].社会学研究,2005(4):240-242. 被引量:17
  • 4蔡溢,许明智,谌红献,李恒芬,贾福军,徐增毅.大学生自尊状况及其相关因素分析[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(5):392-393. 被引量:40
  • 5田录梅,张向葵.高自尊的异质性研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(5):704-709. 被引量:59
  • 6Bailis DS, Chipperfield JG. Compensating for Losses in Perceived Personal Control over Health:A Role for Collective Self-Esteem in Healthy Aging. The Journals of Gerontology,2002,57B ,531-539.
  • 7Katz J,Kwon P. Membership in a Devalued Social Group and Emotional Well-Being: Developing a Model of Personal Self-Esteem, Collective Self- Esteem,and Group Socialization. Sex Roles,2002,47:419-431.
  • 8Kropp F, Lavack AM. Values and Collective Self-esteem as Predictors of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence among University Students. International Marketing Review,2005,22:7-33.
  • 9Cremer DD. Relations of Self-Esteem Concerns, Group Identification, and Self-Stereotyping to In-Group Favoritism. The Journal of Social Psychology ,2001,141 : 389-400.
  • 10Butler SK,Constantine MG. Collective Self-Esteem and Burnout in Professional School Counselors. Professional School Counseling , 2005,9 : 55-62.

共引文献237

同被引文献61

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部