期刊文献+

距离产生美:跨国并购中个人/集体主义价值观差异的不对称效应 被引量:10

Distance Leads to Beauty: Asymmetric Effects of Individualism-Collectivism Value Difference in Cross-border M&As
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文化距离是国际商务的研究热点之一,但现有文献往往将其视为一个整体开展研究,忽略了文化距离的"不对等性"和"不对称性"。为更好地理解文化距离对跨国并购绩效的作用,本文从国家文化层面的个人/集体主义价值观角度切入,运用2000-2014年全球范围内计算机、信息技术和互联网服务行业的126个大型跨国并购事件,探讨个人/集体主义价值观差异对企业跨国并购绩效的影响,以及业务相关性和并购经验的调节作用。研究发现,个人/集体主义价值观差异对跨国并购绩效的作用不对称且具有两面性:当并购方集体主义价值观强于目标方时,个人/集体主义价值观差异与跨国并购绩效负相关,业务相关性会削弱该负面效应;当并购方个人主义价值观强于目标方时,个人/集体主义价值观差异与跨国并购绩效正相关,跨国并购经验会强化该正面效应。 National cultural distance presents a particularly strong challenge for cross-border M&As. It is also one of the hotspots in the field of international business research which many studies tend to view national cultural distance as an integrated concept, ignoring the distinctiveness and asymmetry of national cultural distance. Thus, leading to vague and controversial research findings of national cultural distance in cross-border M&As. For a better understanding of the role of national cultural distance in cross-border M&A performance, this study takes the individualism-collectivism value on the national cultural level as an entry point. Using samples of 126 large-scale cross-border M&A events in the computer, information technology and internet service industries worldwide from 2000 to 2014, and the study investigates the impacts of individualism-collectivism value difference on the post-acquisition performance, as well as the moderating roles of business relatedness and acquisition experience. First, the results show that the effects of individualism-collectivism value difference are asymmetric and has two aspects: when collectivism value of the acquirer is stronger than that of the target, the individualism-collectivism value difference is negatively correlated with the post-acquisition performance, and the business relatedness can weaken this negative effect. When individualism value of the acquirer is stronger than that of the target, the individualism-collectivism value difference is positively correlated with the post-acquisition performance, and the acquisition experience can strengthen this positive effect. Second, this paper also discloses that the other three dimensions of national cultural distance(power distance, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity and femininity) have asymmetric and significant impacts on post-acquisition performance as well. Compared to existing literatures, this paper provides a new theoretical perspective on national cultural distance in international business, and challenges the traditional hypothesis of cultural distance by exploring the double-edged sword effects of individualism-collectivism value on post-acquisition performance. In conclusion, this study will enrich the national cultural distance in international business and cross-border M&A research, and provide some beneficial insights to practitioners and scholars.
作者 李洪 叶广宇 赵文丽 Li Hong;Ye Guangyu;Zhao Wenli(School of Business Management,South China University of Technology)
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期152-164,共13页 Nankai Business Review
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(17JZD020)资助
关键词 跨国并购 个人/集体主义价值观 文化距离 并购整合 Cross-border M&A Individualism-Collectivism Value National Cultural Distance Post-acquisition Integration
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献36

  • 1阎大颖.制度距离、国际经验与中国企业海外并购的成败问题研究[J].南开经济研究,2011(5):75-97. 被引量:119
  • 2陈仁华.合资企业伙伴选择与内部协调[J].管理世界,1988,4(5):92-97. 被引量:2
  • 3徐全勇.外资控制我国中外合资企业的现状、成因与对策[J].商场现代化,2006(10X):12-14. 被引量:2
  • 4Aigbe Akhigbe,Anna D.Martin,Melinda Newman..2003,“Exchange Rate Exposure and Valuation Effects of Cross-border Acquisitions,”International Financial Markets,Institutions and Money(13),255-269.
  • 5Berkovitch,E.,and Narayanan,M.P.,1993,“Motives for Takeovers:An Empirical Investigation,”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28(3),347-362.
  • 6Busse M.Herfeker.C..2007,“Political Risk Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment,”European Journal of Political Economy 23(2),397-415.
  • 7Fan,J.P.H.,T.J.Wong and T.Y.Zhang..2007,“Politically Connected CEOs,Corporate Governance,and Post-IPO Performance of China’s Newly Partially Privatized Firms,”Journal of Financial Economics 84(2),330-57.
  • 8Gondhalekar,V.,and Bhagwat,Y..2003,“Motives in the Acquisitions of Nasdaq Targets During the Aftermath of the 1987 Crash,”The Financial Review(38),553-569.
  • 9Hamish D.Anderson.Ben R.Marshall.2007,“Takeover Motives in a Weak Regulatory Environment Surrounding a Market Shock:a Case Study of New Zealand with a Comparison of Gondhalekar and Bhagwat’s2003,US findings,”Rev Quant Finan Acc(29),53-67.
  • 10Jensen,M.C.,and R.S.Ruback.,(1986)“The Market for Corporate Finance and Takeovers,”American Economics Review(76),323-329.

共引文献75

同被引文献129

引证文献10

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部