期刊文献+

Donabedian质量理论对慢阻肺患者护理质量提升作用的研究 被引量:6

Study on promotion effect of Donabedian quality theory on nursing quality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究Donabedian质量理论对慢阻肺(COPD)患者护理质量的提升作用。方法于2018年28期间采用随机抽样法选取入住本院的老年COPD患者,根据Donabedian质量理论制定出院COPD患者的延续护理的方案;针对整个延续护理方案的各个项目从结构、过程、结果三个方面进行评价,以确保整个方案的有效落实,最后采用SGRQ、6MWT、血气指标及肺功能指标变化情况来评价延续性护理方案对COPD患者生活质量及身体状况的改善效果。结果COPD患者在干预后的6MWT高于干预前的[(355.43±26.78)m比(256.37±18.25)m;(P<0.05)];COPD患者干预后SGRQ中呼吸症状、活动受限、疾病影响、总分均显著低于干预前[(25.44±12.51)分比(50.33±15.48)分,(45.39±15.49)分比(68.47±17.41)分,(24.82±12.13)分比(45.03±16.84)分,(32.43±10.62)分比(57.39±15.57)分],干预前后比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);COPD患者干预后的PCO2显著低于干预前([45.34±6.19)mmHg比(58.42±8.98)mmHg],PO2、FEV1、FEV1/FVC、FVE 1%pred显著高于干预前[(71.52±8.31)mmHg比(55.79±5.72)mmHg,(2.97±1.19)L比(1.84±0.98)L,(69.43±10.19)%比(47.52±9.38)%,(98.34±10.29)%比(41.24±5.88)%],干预前后比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论根据Donabedian质量理论框架制定的护理方案有效的提高了COPD患者的护理质量,能更好的改善COPD患者的生活质量及身体状况。 Objective To study promotion effect of Donabedian quality theory on nursing quality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD).Methods According to Donabedian quality theory,the continuing nursing plan for discharged COPD patients was formulated.The evaluation was conducted from structure,process,and results aspects aimed at each item of entire continuing nursing plan to ensure effective implementation of entire plan.Finally,St.George's Respiratory Questionnaire(SGRQ),6-minute walk test(6MWT),changes in blood gas indexes and lung function indexes were performed to evaluate improvement effects of Donabedian quality theory on quality of life and physical condition in COPD patients.Results The 6MWT of COPD patients after the intervention was significantly higher than that before the intervention[(355.43±26.78)m vs.(256.37±18.25)m](P<0.05).The scores of respiratory symptoms,activity limitation,and disease effects,and the total score of SGRQ of COPD patients after the intervention were significantly lower than those before the intervention[(25.44±12.51)vs.(50.33±15.48),(45.39±15.49)vs.(68.47±17.41),(24.82±12.13)vs.(45.03±16.84),(32.43±10.62)vs.(57.39±15.57)](P<0.05).After the intervention,partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PCO2)of COPD patients was significantly lower than that before the intervention[(45.34±6.19)vs.(58.42±8.98)](P<0.05),while partial pressure of oxygen(PO2),forced expiratory volume in 1 second(FEV1),FEV1/forced vital capacity(FEV1/FVC),and FEV1 as a percentage of predicted value(FEV1%)were significantly higher than those before the intervention[(71.52±8.31)vs.(55.79±5.72),(2.97±1.19)vs.(1.84±0.98),(69.43±10.19)vs.(47.52±9.38),(98.34±10.29)vs.(41.24±5.88)](P<0.05).Conclusion The nursing plan based on Donabedian quality theory framework effectively improve nursing quality in COPD patients,which can better improve quality of life and physical condition of COPD patients.
作者 田晓娜 Tian Xiaona(Henan General Hospital,Zhengzhou 450000,China)
机构地区 河南省职工医院
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2019年第24期4097-4100,共4页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 Donabedian质量理论 肺功能 护理质量 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Donabedian quality theory Lung function Nursing quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献95

  • 1刘宏,李霞,赵爱丽,孙丹,刘玉梅.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的延续护理效果研究[J].中国全科医学,2013,16(8):867-869. 被引量:55
  • 2陆静波.护理质量评价的现状分析及发展构想[J].现代护理,2005,11(1):54-54. 被引量:19
  • 3成翼娟,冯先琼,宋锦平,李继平,岳树锦,谷波,胡秀英,吴欣娟,巩玉秀,李春玉.护理质量评价标准的研究[J].中国护理管理,2005,5(4):26-28. 被引量:69
  • 4吴学敏,侯来永,白伟,彭越,李月,谢欲晓,孙启良,林江涛.呼吸训练对缓解期老年重度COPD患者生存质量及日常生活活动的影响[J].中国康复医学杂志,2006,21(4):307-310. 被引量:92
  • 5Donahfdian A. Quality of care:Problems of measurment. II . Someissues in evaluating the quality of nursing care[J]. AJPH, 1969,59(10);1833 - 1834.
  • 6Isis M. The National Database of Nursing Quality IndicatorsIM(NDNQl? ) [J ]. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing,2007,12⑶:7.
  • 7American Nurses Association. Nursing care report card for acutecarc[M]. Washington ? DC : American Nurses Publishing,1995 : 9 -f>6.
  • 8American Nurses Association. Implementing nursing care reportcard : A study of RN .staffing, length of stay and patient outcomes[M], Washington DC:American Nurses Publishing, 1997 : 1.
  • 9American Nurses Association. Nursing quality indicators beyondacute care : Literature review[M]. Washington DC: American Nur-ses Publishing, 2000 : 1.
  • 10(iallagbcr RM. Rowell A. Claiming the future of nursing throughnursing - sensitive quality indicators [J]. Nursing AdministrationQuarterly. 2003 .27(4) : 273 - 284.

共引文献342

同被引文献60

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部