期刊文献+

解读“穷人思维”:贫困农户风险态度的影响因素分析——来自广西、贵州贫困山区入户实地实验的证据 被引量:3

Understanding ‘the Poor’s Mind’: An Empirical Study on Risk Attitudes of Poor Farmers with the Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural Minority Villages in Western China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用入户实地实验的方式,从贫困农户风险态度的影响因素入手对“穷人思维”进行解读。在广西、贵州两个少数民族聚居乡(镇)进行的抽样调查和实验发现,贫农普遍厌恶风险,特别在面临可能的损失时风险厌恶程度显著上升,但也有部分风险偏好者,在面临可能的损失时却更为偏好风险;越是厌恶风险者获得的实验收益越低,相反越是偏好风险者获得的实验收益越高;配偶、母亲受教育水平的增加显著降低了贫农的风险厌恶程度;家庭承受的教育负担越重,贫农的风险厌恶程度越高。扶贫政策的开展和实施应考虑贫农的风险态度,完善针对风险偏好者的多样化的金融支持和针对风险厌恶者的低息金融扶持,能覆盖更广泛的贫农群体。长期来看,教育扶贫应当成为一项持续的重点扶贫政策,降低家庭教育负担、提高女性的受教育年限、加强成人继续教育培训都将产生长期、积极的显著影响。 Using the method of field experiments,this paper interprets the“thinking of the poor”from the influencing factors of risk attitude of poor farmers.Sample survey and experiment in Guangxi and Guizhou,two minority nationality villages(towns)found that poor peasants generally hate risk,especially when faced with possible losses,the degree of risk aversion increased significantly,but some risk preferences were more risk-averse when faced with possible losses;the more risk-averse peasants got risk-averse,the more risk-averse peasants got risk-aversion.The lower the experimental returns,the higher the experimental returns of the risk-preferent;the higher the educational level of spouses and mothers,the lower the risk aversion of the poor peasants;the heavier the educational burden the family bears,the higher the risk aversion of the poor peasants.The development and implementation of poverty alleviation policies should take into account the risk attitude of poor peasants,improve diversified financial support for risk preferences and low-interest financial support for risk averse,so as to cover a wider group of poor peasants.In the long run,poverty alleviation through education should be a sustained and key poverty alleviation policy.Reducing the burden of family education,increasing women’s education years and strengthening adult continuing education and training will have a long-term,positive and significant impact.
作者 赖玥 柳弌祎 LAI Yue;LIU Yi-yi(Guangxi University of Science and Technology,Liuzhou,Guangxi 545006,China;National Economy Research Institute at Gui’an,Guiyang,Guizhou 550025 China)
出处 《贵州财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期92-101,共10页 Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“经农户风险态度传导的贫困路径依赖与邻里贫困效应的形成及交互机制研究:理论及实验方法的实证”(项目编号:1763005)
关键词 风险态度 风险厌恶 实地实验 贫困 教育扶贫 risk attitude risk aversion field experiment poverty poverty alleviation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献71

  • 1吴兴陆,亓名杰.农民工迁移决策的社会文化影响因素探析[J].中国农村经济,2005(1):26-32. 被引量:110
  • 2程昆,潘朝顺,黄亚雄.农村社会资本的特性、变化及其对农村非正规金融运行的影响[J].农业经济问题,2006,27(6):31-35. 被引量:59
  • 3邹薇,周浩.中国省际增长差异的源泉的测算与分析(1978~2002)——基于“反事实”收入法的经验研究[J].管理世界,2007,23(7):37-46. 被引量:18
  • 4Bennett,R.,Y.Ismael, U.Kambhampati and S.Morse, 2004, "Economic Impact of Genetically Modified Cotton in India", AgBioForum, 7(3), pp.96-100.
  • 5Binswanger, H.P., 1980,“Attitudes toward Risk: Experimental Measurement in Rural India”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 395.
  • 6Huang,J., F.Qiao, L.Zhang and S.Rozelle, 2000, "Farm Pesticide, Rice Production, and Human Health", EEPSEA Working Paper, Singapore.
  • 7Huang,J., S.Rozelle, C.E.Pray and Q.Wang, 2002a, "Plant Biotechnology in China", Science, 295(25), pp.674-677.
  • 8Huang, J., R. Hu, S. Rozelle, F. Qiao and C. E. Pray, 2002b, “Small Holders, Transgenic Varieties and Production Efficiency: The Case of Cotton Farmers in China”, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 46(3), pp.1-21.
  • 9Pemsl,D., H.Waibel and A.P.Gutierrez, 2005, "Why do Some Bt-Cotton Farmers in China Continue to Use High Levels of Pesticides", International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 3( 1 ), pp.44-56.
  • 10Pingali, P.L. and Roger, P.A., 1995, "Impact of Pesticides on Farmer Health and the Rice Environment", Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts.

共引文献382

同被引文献69

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部