急诊护理路径对急性心肌梗死抢救效果的影响

Effect of emergency nursing route on the rescue effect of acute myocardial infarction

以了解急诊护理路径对急性心肌梗死抢救效果的影响为目的,为后续临床护理的开展提供参考。以2017年8月2019年8月在调研的医院接受治疗的70例急性心肌梗死患者为研究对象,按照接受治疗的时间先后顺序分为对照组和实验组。对照组患者以一般护理路径开展护理,实验组患者则采取急诊护理路径进行护理,分析两组的急诊分诊时间、急诊停留时间、静脉通道建立时间、院内心肌梗死复发率、再PCI率。实验组患者的急诊分诊时间、急诊停留时间、静脉通道建立时间均短于对照组(P<0.05),差异具有统计学意义。对照组院内心肌梗死复发率为17.1%,实验组为2.8%;对照组再PCI发生率为22.8%,实验组为5.7%,两组差异显著(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。采取急诊护理路径对急性心肌梗死患者进行干预,可有效提高急救质量,值得在临床推广使用。

In order to understand the effect of emergency nursing pathway on the rescue of acute myocardial infarction, and provide reference for the follow-up clinical nursing. 70 patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated in the investigated hospital from August 2017 to August 2019 were divided into control group and experimental group according to the time sequence of treatment. The patients in the control group were treated by general nursing route, while the patients in the experimental group were treated by emergency nursing route. The time of emergency triage and emergency stay of the two groups were analyzed, the establishment time of vein channel, the recurrence rate of myocardial infarction and the rate of PCI. The time of emergency triage, emergency stay and establishment of vein channel in experimental group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). The recurrence rate of myocardial infarction was 17.1% in the control group, 2.8% in the experimental group, 22.8% in the control group and 5.7% in the experimental group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The emergency nursing pathway can effectively improve the quality of emergency treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarction, and it is worthy of clinical application.