期刊文献+

基于支持向量机模型的滑坡危险性评价 被引量:33

Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Based on Support Vector Machine Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以长安区为研究区,在分析研究区地质环境条件以及滑坡发育特征的基础上,选取12类因子作为评价指标,通过Spearman对各因子之间的相关性进行分析;分别采用线性核函数(LN)、多项式核函数(PL)、径向基核函数(RBF)、Sigmoid核函数下的支持向量机模型对研究区地质灾害危险性进行评价,利用ArcGIS软件生成最终的危险性评价结果图,将评价结果图划分为四个危险等级,分别为极高危险区、高危险区、中危险区、低危险区;不同核函数下的支持向量机模型经ROC曲线验证得到:RBF-SVM模型的预测精度最高,此核函数下的支持向量机模型更适应于该研究区滑坡灾害危险性评价中。研究结论可以为类似地质环境条件下区域地质灾害危险性评价模型的选取提供参考。 Chang'an district is taken as the research area.Based on the analysis of geological environment conditions and the characteristics of landslide development in the study area,12 types of evaluation index factors are selected.Spearman was adopted to analyze the correlation among various factors.The SVM model with four types of kernel classifiers such as linear(LN),polynomial(PL),radial basis function(RBF),sigmoid(SIG)were used to the susceptibility assessment of the landslide hazard.The final susceptibility assessment result map was generated by ArcGIS software.The assessment result map was grouped into four classes,namely,low,moderate,high,and very high.The SVM assessment model under different kernel functions was verified by ROC curve:the prediction accuracy of RBF-SVM model is the highest,which is more suitable for the evaluation of landslide hazard in the study area.This conclusion can provide reference for the selection regional geological hazard assessment model under similar geological environment conditions.
作者 王念秦 郭有金 刘铁铭 朱清华 WANG Nian-qin;GUO You-jin;LIU Tie-ming;ZHU Qing-hua(College of Geology and Environment,Xi’an University of Science and Technology,Xi’an 710054,China;Xi’an Planning Bureau,Xi’an 710054,China)
出处 《科学技术与工程》 北大核心 2019年第35期70-78,共9页 Science Technology and Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金(41572287) 陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划(2016KTCL03-19) 陕西省煤田地质局科技计划(JB2014-4)资助
关键词 滑坡 危险性评价 评价因子 支持向量机 核函数 ROC曲线 landslide susceptibility assessment the evaluation factors SVM kernel functionROC curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献59

  • 1黄润秋,向喜琼,巨能攀.我国区域地质灾害评价的现状及问题[J].地质通报,2004,23(11):1078-1082. 被引量:115
  • 2张业成,胡景江,张春山.中国地质灾害危险性分析与灾变区划[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1995,15(3):55-67. 被引量:44
  • 3王志旺,李端有,王湘桂.证据权法在滑坡危险度区划研究中的应用[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(8):1268-1273. 被引量:51
  • 4高文学.中国自然灾害史(总论)[M].北京:地震出版社,1996..
  • 5LEE S, MINK. Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea[J]. Environmental Geology, 2001, 40(9): 1 095- 1 113.
  • 6BAEZA C, COROMINAS J. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility by means of multivariate statistical techniques[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2001, 26(12): 1 251 - 1 263.
  • 7YESILNACAR E, TOPAL T. Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region(Turkey)[J]. Engineering Geology, 2005, 79(3/4): 251-266.
  • 8TANG C, ZHU J, QI X. Landslide hazard assessment of the 2008 Wenehuan earthquake: a ease study in Beichuan area[J]. Canadian Geoteehnieal Journal, 2011, 48(1): 128 - 145.
  • 9GUZZETTI F, CARRARA A, CARDINALI M, et al. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy[J]. Geomorphology, 1999, 31(1/4): 181 - 216.
  • 10GORSEVSKI P V, JANKOWSKI E Disceming landslide susceptibility using rough sets[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2008, 32(1): 53-65.

共引文献295

同被引文献436

引证文献33

二级引证文献219

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部