论六朝道教“葛氏道”与“元始旧经”的关系——对刘屹博士《六朝道教古灵宝经的历史学研究》的商榷

On the Relationship between“Ge-Shi Taoism”and“Yuanshi Old Scriptures”in the Six Dynasties Period——A Discussion about Doctor Liu Yi’s Work—A Historiographical Study of the Compilation of the Lingbao Scriptures in the Six Dynasties Period

国内外学术界长期以来都认为六朝江南道教团体"葛氏道"与东晋末年古灵宝经"元始旧经"的创作密切相关。近十多年来有研究者一直完全否定"葛氏道"与"元始旧经"有关,提出二者的关系是北宋初张君房在《灵宝略纪》中为了整合道教的需要而杜撰的,并以此为基础对古灵宝经所有主要问题都进行了最具有颠覆性的研究。然而"葛氏道"与"元始旧经"的关系,其实在古灵宝经和南朝道教宗师陆修静的著作中都有非常明确的记载。而人为地将二者割裂的做法,既不符合古灵宝经的实际情况,也很容易造成学术界对古灵宝经认知的严重混乱。

Academic circles at home and abroad have long believed that the Ge-Shi Taoism in the Jiangnan region of Six Dynasties had close relations with the creation of the old Lingbao Scriptures in the late East-jin Dynasty. In the recent ten years, there is a researcher who totally denies the relation between the two and put forward the idea that the relation between the two is imaginary by Zhang Junfang who fabricated it in the book of Lingbao Lve Ji in order to integrate the Taoism in the early North Song Dynasty. And on this basis, this researcher have subversively studied all the major problems of the Lingbao Scriptures. However, the relation between Ge-Shi Taoism and the old Lingbao Scriptures had been very clearly recorded in the Lingbao Scriptures and the work of Lu Xiujing that was a Taoist master in the Southern Dynasties. The practice that factitiously cutting off the relation between the two does not accord with the actual situation of the Lingbao Scriptures, and will give rise to easily some serious confusion of academic circles on the cognition of the Lingbao Scriptures.