期刊文献+

为学而教:3P教学模型对大学本科教育改革的启示 被引量:17

Teaching for Learning: The Enlightenment of John Biggs’ 3P Teaching Model to the Reform of Undergraduate Education in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高等教育由大众化向普及化阶段转变,提高高等教育质量成为世界各国关注的焦点。约翰·比格斯3P教学模型围绕学生学习这条主线,构建了由“前提”“过程”和“结果”三个环节组成的螺旋上升的学习闭环,其核心理念是“为学而教”,推进传统教学范式的变革,实现从“教”向“学”的转变,旨在促进学生学习质量提高。文章剖析了3P教学模型的理论内涵、教育理念及其时代意义,通过分析与借鉴,提出推进“双一流”建设背景下中国本科教育改革的举措。 As higher education increasingly moves towards popularization, improving the quality of higher education has become the focus of attention of all countries in the world. The John Biggs 3P teaching model revolves around the main line of student learning and constructs a spiraling learning loop consisting of three parts: "presage", "process" and "product". The core idea is to "teach for learning", to promote the transformation of the traditional teaching paradigm, to achieve the transition from "teaching" to "learning", and aimed at promoting students’ learning quality. This paper analyzes the theoretical connotation, educational concept and significance of the 3P teaching model. Through analysis and reference, it proposes the measures to promote the reform of undergraduate education in China under the background of "double first-class" construction.
作者 纪春 Ji Chun
出处 《江苏高教》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第12期109-115,共7页 Jiangsu Higher Education
基金 全国教育科学规划课题国家一般课题“大学本科教育的‘学习范式’转型:国际趋势与本土探索”(BIA180172)
关键词 为学而教 3P教学模型 本科教育 约翰·比格斯 teaching for learning 3P teaching model undergraduate education John Biggs
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献99

  • 1方巍.美国高校学生发展理论评述[J].外国教育研究,1996(4):47-51. 被引量:25
  • 2王玉衡.美国大学教学学术运动[J].清华大学教育研究,2006,27(2):84-90. 被引量:65
  • 3张红霞.从国际经验看研究型大学本科教学改革的基本原则[J].高等教育研究,2006,27(12):60-65. 被引量:54
  • 4潘懋元,罗丹.高校教师发展简论[J].中国大学教学,2007(1):5-8. 被引量:320
  • 5Laurie Richlin. Scholarly Teaching and the Scholarship of Teaching[J]. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001 (8).
  • 6Boyer, Ernest L Scholarship Reconsidered. Priorities of the Professoriate[R]. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.
  • 7Michael B. Paulsen. The Relation Between Research and the Scholarship of Teaching[J].New Directionfor Teaching and Learning ,2001(8).
  • 8Hutchings,Pat,ed. The Ethics of Inquiry: Issues in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2002.
  • 9Glassick, Charles E. , Mary Taylor Huber, and Gene I. Maeroff. Scholarship Assessed : Evaluation of the Professoriater[J]. 1997.
  • 10伯顿·克托克.高等教育新论-多学科的研究[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,1988.27.

共引文献487

同被引文献144

引证文献17

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部