期刊文献+

人工智能裁判与审判中心主义的冲突及其消解 被引量:35

The Conflicts between AI Judgment and Trial Centralism and Their Resolutions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人工智能裁判的运行逻辑和审判中心主义的内在机理存在显著冲突。弱人工智能裁判的实践样态与强人工智能的未来图景已出现了对基本的司法原则和价值的减损,并使得审判中心主义改革的诸多制度设计被消解。现代科技与司法相结合已然是一种显性趋势,在充分利用科技红利促进智慧司法建设的过程中,应通过规制算法黑箱、限制人工智能裁判的适用、保障人工智能裁判中的律师参与、强化基于人机协同的说理等措施,消解技术融入司法所产生的冲突,以实现人工智能裁判在绩效和程序上的合法性与正当性。 There are significant conflicts between the operation logic of AI judgment and the intrinsic mechanism of trial centralism. There has been a derogation of basic judicial principles and values in the practice of weak AI judgment and the future prospect of strong AI judgment,which has decomposed many institutional designs for the reform of trial centralism. Since justice combined with modern technology has become a dominant trend,in the process of making full use of the dividend of science and technology to promote the construction of intelligent justice,we should resolve the conflicts caused by the integration of technology into justice to realize the legality and legitimacy in the performance and procedure of AI judgment by regulating the black box algorithm,restricting the application of AI judgment,ensuring the participation of lawyers in AI judgment or strengthening the argumentation based on man-machine collaboration.
作者 胡铭 张传玺 Hu Ming;Zhang Chuanxi
出处 《东南学术》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第1期213-221,248,共10页 Southeast Academic Research
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“深化司法体制改革和现代科技应用相结合的难点与路径研究”(项目编号:18ZDA137) 浙江大学“人工智能与法学”专项
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献199

共引文献1424

同被引文献571

引证文献35

二级引证文献151

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部