期刊文献+

吸声尖劈高频声学特性比较评价法 被引量:1

Comparative evaluation method for high-frequency acoustic characteristics of sound absorbing wedges
下载PDF
导出
摘要 吸声尖劈的声学性能直接影响消声室自由声场空间范围的参数结果,然而驻波比法和传递函数法无法评价吸声尖劈的高频声学特性,为此提出一种自由声场空间范围比较评价法,实现吸声尖劈高频声学特性的评价。该方法建立在已知自由声场空间范围的消声室环境基础上(自由声场空间范围定义为参考值),将消声室内足够面积的尖劈替换为被校准的吸声尖劈,测量当前轴向的自由场空间范围结果并与参考值进行比较,得到被校准吸声尖劈与参考尖劈的声学特性差异,实验结果表明该方法有效可行。此外,设计3组实验对该方法进行优化:在实际应用中传声器朝向声源测量、声压级结果需进行声衰减补偿,消声室内地网铺设吸声材料可有效降低实验误差。 The acoustic performance of sound absorbing wedges directly affects the parameter results of the free sound field spatial range of anechoic chamber.However,the standing wave ratio method and the transfer function method cannot evaluate the high frequency acoustic characteristics of the sound absorbing wedges.To this end,a free sound field spatial range comparative evaluation method is proposed to evaluate the high frequency acoustic characteristics of the sound absorption wedges.The method is based on the anechoic chamber environment of the known free sound field spatial range(the free field domain is defined as the reference value),and the sufficient area of the anechoic chamber is replaced with the calibrated sound absorbing wedges.Measuring the current axial free field domain result and comparing it with the reference value to obtain the difference in acoustic characteristics between the calibrated sound absorbing wedges and the reference wedges.Experimental results show that the method is effective and feasible.In addition,three sets of experiments are designed to optimize the method.In practical applications,the microphone towards the sound source to measures the sound pressure level,sound pressure level results require acoustic attenuation compensation,the sound absorbing material is spread in the grounding net,which can effectively reduce the experimental error.
作者 高申平 张小改 吴德林 余崇皓 陈俭 俞醒言 GAO Shenping;ZHANG Xiaogai;WU Delin;YU Chonghao;CHEN Jian;YU Xingyan(Zhejiang Institute of Metrology,Hangzhou 310013,China;Key Laboratory of Acoustics and Vibration Precision Measuring Technology of Zhejiang Province,Hangzhou 310013,China)
出处 《中国测试》 CAS 北大核心 2019年第12期152-158,共7页 China Measurement & Test
基金 国家重点研发计划(2016YFF0201006) 浙江省质量技术监督系统科研计划项目(20180103)
关键词 吸声尖劈 高频声学性能评价 自由声场空间范围 比较评价法 sound absorption wedge high-frequency acoustic performance evaluation free field domain comparative evaluation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1孙广荣.消声室内最大自由声场误差的估算.声学技术,1987,6(2):16-18.
  • 2仉乃琛,沈保罗.噪声和电声测量技术[M].上海:上海同济大学出版社,1990.
  • 3杭州电声厂.杭州电声厂消声室声学性能测试报告[R].北京:[出版社不详],1986.
  • 4陆轸.实验室设计[M].北京:北京中国建筑工业出版社,1981.
  • 5中国科学院声学研究所,南京大学.GB/T6882--2008声学声压法测定噪声源声功率级消声室半消声室精密法[s].北京:中国标准化出版社,2008.
  • 6ISO:ISO 3745. Acoustics detemination of sound power levels of noise sources precision methods for an- echoic and hemi anechoie rooms[S]. ISO:ISO Press, 2009.
  • 7南京大学物理系声学实验室.南京大学消声室.物理学报,1975,(4):252-259.
  • 8Mia Suhanek, Kristian Jambrosic, Marko Horvat. A comparison of two methods for measuring the sound absorption coefficient using impedance tubes[R]. 50 th International Symposium ELMAR-2008, 10-12 September 2008.
  • 9Farina A, Fausti P. Standing wave tube techniques for measuring the normal incidence absorption coefficient: comparison of different experimental setups[J]. Fase 94 Valencia 15/17 November, 1994.
  • 10ASTM E1050 (1990). Standard test method for impedance and absorption of acoustical materials using a tube, two microphones and a digital frequency analysis system[S].

共引文献14

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部