期刊文献+

虚列被告规避管辖的识别与规制

Identification and Regulation of False Defendants’ Circumvention Jurisdiction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 原告出于自身利益的考量是引发原告虚列被告规避管辖的内在动因,而立法上对行为规制的缺失以及识别难度高是外在因素,唯有通过立法、司法上的积极作为,才能予以规制。司法上,增设主动识别机制,完善被动识别机制。立法上,首先是庭前准备阶段,预防措施的构建;其次,被告可向原告寻求赔偿的事后救济措施的构建;最后,惩治措施的建设,即对原告采取训诫、罚款甚至拘留的强制措施。 The consideration of the plaintiff for his own interests is the internal motivation for the plaintiff to evade the jurisdiction of the defendant.However,the lack of legislation and the difficulty of identification are external factors.Only through legislative and judicial positive actions can be regulated.In the judical aspect,an active identification mechanism is added to improve the passive identification mechanism.In legislation,the first step is the preparation stage before the court,and the construction of preventive measures.Secondly,the defendant can seek compensation for the after-effects of the plaintiff.Finally,the construction of the punishment measures means the enforcement of the plaintiff,the fines and even the compulsory measures.
作者 周星辰 ZHOU Xing-chen(Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411100)
机构地区 湘潭大学
出处 《牡丹江大学学报》 2020年第1期85-88,共4页 Journal of Mudanjiang University
关键词 虚列 识别 事前预防 事后救济 惩治 virtual-arrangement identification pre-prevention after-relief punishment
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献2

  • 1侯捷.网络侵权案件管辖权探析[J].当代法学,2002,16(8):37-40. 被引量:30
  • 2深圳市中级人民法院知识产权庭.“网络环境下侵害著作权纠纷案件的调研报告”,栽《知识产权审判指导》总第19辑2012年9月.

共引文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部