期刊文献+

Experimental manipulation of reproductive tactics in Seba’s short-tailed bats:consequences on sperm quality and oxidative status

原文传递
导出
摘要 To reproduce,males have to fertilize the female’s eggs,sometimes in competition with ejaculates of other males.In species where males display alternative reproductive tactics,whereby territorial males secure mating and non-territorial males have to sneak copulations,the latter might be expected to invest relatively more resources towards sperm quality compared with the territorial males.Sperm cells are especially vulnerable to oxidative stress,which reduces male fertility.Therefore,antioxidant resources are expected to modulate sperm quality,and might be allocated differently between reproductive tactics.To test the link between reproductive tactics,redox profile and sperm quality,we experimentally induced changes in the reproductive tactics of 39 captive males Seba's short-tailed bats Carollia perspicillata.We monitored the blood and ejaculate oxidative balance,and the sperm quality before,7 days and 21 days after the manipulation of reproductive tactic.Although ejaculates'oxidative damage was negatively related to sperm velocity,males exhibited similar blood and ejaculates redox profiles and similar sperm quality,regardless of their reproductive tactic.Possibly,these results arise as a consequence of some constraints having been lifted during the experiment.Our results also suggest that,in Seba's short-tailed bats,the expression of alternative reproductive tactics is not subjected to strong oxidative constraints.Furthermore,our results could reflect an absence of trade-off between pre-and post-copulatory traits in harem males,as they could be selected to invest both in female attraction and sperm quality,as a consequence of their inability to fully monopolize females.
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2019年第6期609-616,共8页 动物学报(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献155

  • 1Aitken ILl, Baker M, 2006. Oxidative stress, sperm survival and fertility control. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 250: 66-69.
  • 2Andersson M, 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton: Princeton Uni- verstiy Press.
  • 3Bakker TCM, 2010. Retro- and perspective: Determinants of dominance. In: von Hippel FA ed. Tinbergen's Legacy in Be- haviour: Sixty Years of Landmark Stickleback Papers. Leiden: Brill, 117-132.
  • 4Bakker TCM, Milinski M, 1993. The advantages of being red: Sexual selection in the stickleback. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 23: 287-300.
  • 5Bakker TCM, Zbinden M, Frommen JG, Weiss A, Largiad6r CR, 2006. Slow fertilization of stickleback eggs: The result of sexual conflict? BMC Ecol. 6: 7.
  • 6Birkhead TR, Pellatt EJ, Brekke P, Yeates R, Castillo-Juarez H, 2005. Genetic effects on sperm design in the zebra finch. Na- ture 434: 383-387.
  • 7Blount JD, Metcalfe NB, Birkhead TR, Surai PF, 2003. Carote- noid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finches. Science 300: 125-127.
  • 8Blount JD, Moiler AP, Houston DC, 2001. Antioxidants, showy males and sperm quality. Ecol. Lett. 4: 393-396.
  • 9Borg B, 1982. Seasonal effects ofphotoperiod and temperature on spermatogenesis and male secondary sexual characters in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. Can. J. Zool. 60: 3377-3386.
  • 10Borg B, Bomestaf C, Hellqvist A, Schmitz M, Mayer I, 2004. Mechanisms in the photoperiodic control of reproduction in the stickleback. Behaviour 141: 1521-1530.

共引文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部