有悖于史实——读黄俶成《水泊惊雷——施耐庵与水浒创作》

Contrary to Historical Facts——Reading Huang Chucheng’s Shuibo Shock-Shi Nai’an and The Water Margin

黄俶成先生的《水泊惊雷--施耐庵与水浒创作》中有悖于史实之处很多:“认定”的施彦端生于1296年,卒于1370年是有悖于史实;《水浒传》作者的“中进士”与“官钱塘”问题只是推测;“廷佐铭”中的“口口口”还未有定论;把兴化施彦端与杭州施惠“合二为一”也是移花接木。有关文物史料,一定要实事求是,深入分析。

There are many things that go against the historical facts in Huang Chucheng’s Shuibo Shock-Shi Nai’an and The Water Margin.Shi Yanduan was identified to be from 1296 to1370,which is against the historical facts and not completely believable.Jinshi and Qiantang Governor were only conjectures and Tingzuoming was not conclusive yet.The combination of Xinghua Shi Yanduan and Hangzhou Shihui is also like a matter of transplanting flowers and trees.Relevant historical materials must be realistic and analyzed in depth.