无过失医疗损害责任纠纷案中公平责任适用的实证研究

Empirical Study on the Application of Equitable Liability in No-fault Medical Disputes

本文分析无过失医疗损害责任纠纷案件中公平责任的司法实践现况后发现,仍然存在公平责任的适用情况,且时间、地区、损害结果都对公平责任的适用有影响;患者主张的诉讼标的额与法院判决的实际金额之间存在线性关系;在司法实践中公平责任的适用条件不明晰,判决尺度不统一,存在“同案不同判”的司法乱象。由此提出,应当淘汰公平责任在无过失医疗损害责任纠纷案件中的适用,让医疗损害责任归责原则真正回归“过错责任原则”。

This article describes and analyzes the current state of judicial practice of equitable liability in no-fault medical disputes and it is found that there are still some problems in the application of equitable liability,and the time,region and damage result have an impact on the application.There is a linear relationship between the amount of litigation subject claimed by patients and the actual amount awarded by the court.In the judicial practice,the applicable conditions of equitable liability are not clear,the judgment scale is not uniform,and there are different judgments in the same case.It is suggested that we should eliminate the application of equitable liability in no-fault medical disputes and apply the principle of fault liability in imputation principle of medical injury liability.