摘要
我国《著作权法(草案送审稿)》第14条拟创设追续权制度,但并未规定具体的义务主体及保护办法。我国是否有必要在此时引入追续权制度,必须通过详细的正当性及可行性检验。虽然追续权制度具有一定的正当性基础,但目前我国不具备适宜的艺术品交易市场、缺乏切实可行的配套实施措施,并且追续权制度本身成本收益比较低,追续权制度可能带来的负面影响较大。追续权入法不应仓促进行,而应待市场更成熟后,在制定一系列配套措施的基础上徐徐图之。
Article 14 of the Copyright Law of China(Committee Drafts)intends to create resale rights,but it does not specify the subject of obligation and protection measures.Whether it is necessary for China to add resale rights needs a detailed test on legitimacy and feasibility.Although it has a certain legitimacy basis,at present,China does not have a suitable art trading market,and lacks practical supporting measures.Besides,due to the low cost-benefit,the resale rights may bring about a greater negative impact.Therefore,the adding of resale rights should not be promoted hastily,but be based on the for⁃mulation of a series of supporting measures when the market is more mature.
出处
《南海法学》
2019年第4期39-47,共9页
The South China Sea Law Journal
基金
教育部、国家外国专家局“高等学校学科创新引智计划”（B18058）
中国国家留基委2019年“国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目”（201907080016）
关键词
追续权
《著作权法(草案送审稿)》
实施障碍
立法建议
resale rights
Copyright Law(Committee Drafts)
implementation obstacles
legislative suggestions
