期刊文献+

基于fsQCA的竞赛式众包社区知识共享行为构型研究 被引量:8

Knowledge Sharing of Competitive Crowdsourcing Community Based on fsQCA
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】通过分析众包社区的知识贡献者,获得知识贡献的不同构型,从而引导社区成员进行知识共享。【方法】采用基于模糊集的定性比较分析方法,以竞赛式众包社区中进行知识贡献的社区成员为研究对象,从社区环境、动机理论、沉没成本效应三个方面划分条件变量,将知识贡献程度设为结果变量,以获得知识贡献的构型。【结果】高程度知识贡献为:(1)有管理员引导的社区,可通过圈币奖励与沉没成本(时间或金钱)引导社区成员进行高程度的知识贡献;(2)已有金钱投入的社区成员,可通过圈币与计入时长引导其进行高程度的知识贡献。低程度知识贡献为:(1)在缺乏管理员引导的社区,社区成员难以获得高程度的知识贡献;(2)在时间投入与圈币奖励同时存在,而金钱投入不存在的情况下,较难获得高程度的知识贡献。【局限】部分变量的校准缺乏理论依据;仅研究单一网站,结果的普适性受到一定限制;研究采用截面数据,对于结果的推断会有一定影响。【结论】本研究有利于众包社区对社区成员的知识共享行为进行引导,以提高社区成员的个人能力,进而提高众包任务的质量。 [Objective]This paper analyzes the contributions of the crowdsourcing community members,aiming to encourage them to share more knowledge.[Methods]We adopted qualitative comparison method based on fuzzy sets to study these members from a competitive knowledge crowdsourcing community.Then,we chose condition variables from community environment,motivation theory,and sunk cost effect.Finally,we used the degree of knowledge contribution as the result variable.[Results]There are two types of high-level knowledge sharing configurations:(Ⅰ)Communities with administrators could lead members to a high degree of knowledge sharing through currency rewards and sunk costs(time or money);(Ⅱ)Community members invested money and time could also promote high-level knowledge sharing.There are two types of low-level knowledge sharing:(Ⅰ)In communities without administrators,it is hard for members to share knowledge;(Ⅱ)Community members without money or time investments had low level of knowledge sharing.[Limitations]We only studied one website and the cross-section of research data might influence our results.[Conclusions]The proposed method helps the knowledge sharing community improve member management,as well as the quality of crowdsourcing tasks.
作者 卢新元 王雪霖 代巧锋 Lu Xinyuan;Wang Xuelin;Dai Qiaofeng(School of Information Management,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China;Hubei Electronic Commerce Research Center,Wuhan 430079,China)
出处 《数据分析与知识发现》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第11期60-69,共10页 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目“众包模式下用户参与行为对企业创新绩效的影响研究”(项目编号:71471074)的研究成果之一
关键词 fsQCA 构型 知识共享 Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Configuration Knowledge Sharing
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献118

  • 1夏鑫,何建民,刘嘉毅.定性比较分析的研究逻辑——兼论其对经济管理学研究的启示[J].财经研究,2014,40(10):97-107. 被引量:83
  • 2Nahapiet, J., & S. Ghoshal. Social Capital, intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998,23(2) :242- 266.
  • 3Hendriks, P.Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing[J] .Knowledge and Process Management, 1999,6(2) :91 - 100.
  • 4Davenport, T. H.Ten Principles of Knowledge Management and Four Case Studies[J] .Knowledge and Process Management, 1997,4(3) : 187 - 208.
  • 5Senge, P. Sharing knowledge [ J ] . Executive Excellence, 1998,15(6) :11 - 12.
  • 6Nonaka, I.& Takeuchi, H.The Knowledge - Creating Company[ M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • 7Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. Working Knowledge:How Organizations Manage What They Know[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
  • 8Pfeffer, J.The Human Equation: Building profits by putting people first [ M ] . Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
  • 9Stauffer, D. Why people hoard knowledge [ J ]. Across the Board, 1999,36(8) : 16 - 21.
  • 10Earl, M.J., & Scott, I.A. Opinion: What is a Chief Knowledge Officer? [ J]. Sloan Management Review,1999,40,(2) :29 - 38.

共引文献1714

同被引文献99

引证文献8

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部