摘要
锺嵘评价谢灵运“杂有景阳之体”的依据在于二者在诗中大量写景以及“巧似”的写景方式。谢诗多以“赋”法写景,形成了繁芜的诗歌特点。基于“吟咏情性”的诗歌观念,锺嵘跳出“山水”范畴,虽忽略了景物在二人诗中地位不同的问题,但为我们重新思考谢灵运的文学身份以及探寻谢灵运诗歌渊源提供了新的思路。
Zhong Rong viewed that Xie Lingyun’s poetry is influenced by Jing Yang because many poems of both Xie Lingyun and Jing Yang describe landscape by using the way of“Qiaosi”.Xie Lingyun described landscape with“Fu”,loaded with unnecessary words.Zhong Rong no longer focused on landscape but on feeling and affection.Although this overlooks the status of landscape in the poems of the two poets,it has provided a new perspective for understanding Xie Linyun’s literary identity and the source of his poems.
作者
石蝶
SHI Die(Chinese Department,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an 710119,China)
出处
《中北大学学报(社会科学版)》
2020年第2期91-95,共5页
Journal of North University of China:Social Science Edition
关键词
《诗品》
张协
谢灵运
“巧似”
“山水”
Grades of Poetry
Zhang Xie
Xie Lingyun
“Qiaosi”
“landscape”