期刊文献+

Consteel电炉与烟道竖炉炼钢技术的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Steel-Making Technology between Consteel Electric Furnace and Flue Shaft Furnace
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从原辅料消耗、动力消耗等方面对Consteel电炉与烟道竖炉炼钢技术进行了对比。结果表明:Consteel电炉的预热温度较低;Consteel电炉吨钢电耗、烟气中二噁英含量、烟尘量耐材消耗比烟道竖炉低,但电极损耗却比烟道竖炉高,综合考虑,Consteel电炉炼钢技术将成为一种发展趋势。 This paper compares Consteel electric furnace and flue shaft furnace scrap steel-making technology in terms of raw and auxiliary material consumption and power consumption.The results show that the preheating temperature of the Consteel electric furnace is lower;the electricity consumption per ton of Consteel electric furnace,the dioxin content in the flue gas,and the refractory material consumption of the flue gas are lower than that of the flue shaft furnace,but the electrode loss is higher than that of the flue shaft furnace.Considering comprehensively,Consteel electric furnace scrap preheating technology will become a development trend.
作者 张送来 ZHANG Songlai(Guizhou Zhengye Engineering Investment Co.Ltd.,Guiyang 550005,China)
出处 《工业加热》 CAS 2019年第6期41-43,共3页 Industrial Heating
关键词 CONSTEEL电炉 烟道竖炉 废钢预热 Consteel electric furnace flue shaft furnace scrap preheating
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献9

共引文献16

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部